This is such a 2 sided thing. On one hand I know it would help provide the 'added' security for the patient, as well as the caregiver (being falsely accused), but on the other hand, you would feel like 'big brother' was everywhere.
I would not object, as a healthcare provider, but I would want to be advised beforehand. I've never worked where there was 'active pt. abuse' going on.....I'm glad too.
As a patient, I would want the added security, but I would'nt want my 'pride' showing, if you know what I mean
This is also a cost issue and alot of smaller facilities wouldn't be able to handle it. Some of them are having trouble meeting cost already, but if it is passed by each state, they'll have to comply.
Like you stated, if it was acknowledged prior to employment, I really think the caregivers would 'make sure they were doing their job and doing it right'. I think it would help with productivity, but facilities would have to 'shell out more $$' just to keep people working in those conditions.