Originally Posted by siri
Why aren't adult deaths just as important? Just as hard on the family member?
I didn't say this, even though I WOULD take the position that the death of a child is more traumatic.
I SAID that a parent can make decisions for a minor. An adult is different. If you truly believe that we should go down this road, then consent to witness should become part of advanced directives.
Unless that patient gives expressed consent for witnesses, then it is a violation of right to privacy. We cannot boldly declare that patients have rights, unless of course WE decide they aren't worth merit. The inherent problem is that a crashing patient cannot consent to witnesses. And a potential witness cannot understand the ramifications of what is being offered to them.
This reminds me of the old days, where a patient's advance directives ended the moment a family member objected. It's basically what we are saying now: a patient's right to dignity is only as good as a family member's objection. Only, it's not the family members, per se, violating that right and dignity. It's US, for offering to undermine it.
I wouldn't call this advocacy. (and consent is only one of many concerns).
As far as citing my material, I was compiling it on Word and the program crashed. I'll have to go back over it again - but alot of the data comes from AAST (amer assoc of surgery for trauma), the ENA (emergency nurses assoc) and, I believe, the College of ER Physicians.
Siri, you said you did a thesis on this topic. Can you quote a study w/ a significant statistical population? If we want our colleagues to take nursing research seriously, then we must apply the same rigid standards that we expect of others.
I'll be back after I recompile some data.
~faith,
Timothy.