#1 Nursing Resource: 8 Million pageviews per month

Log in   Sign up   Why join?   | Layout: Switch to narrow layout Color: gold style blue style rose style
Nursing Community for Nurses
Home Forums Articles Specialty Students Region Career Resources

Advanced Search Site Help Site Map

Research Critique



Currently Online
Members: 380
Guests: 2,334
2,714

Job Spotlight
ER & L&D RN
Houston, Texas
Administrator
Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
Forum Spotlight
Distance Learning for Nursing

Nursing Degrees

Nursing Articles

The Case Of The Missing Dentures
Funny Nursing Stories
Funny Nursing Stories
Funny Nursing Stories
Be Kind to Co-workers, Or Else
Fixodent or Forget it!
Me and Mr. Smith and Waffles
How quickly we forget.
It is my X-ray
Thanksgiving Humor
Submit An Article

Nursing Jobs

Job Seeker: Employer:

Scrubs & Gear

Newsletter

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the free allnurses.com Nurse-zine Newsletter.

Enter email address:


Read current:
Nursing Newsletter

How-To allnurses

allnurses videos

Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses

The largest most active online nursing community. Join 312,597 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.

Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Nov 03, 2005, 03:04 PM
VickyRN's Avatar
Nursing Champion
Join Date: Mar 2001
Research Critique

This is a critique I did for my nursing research class (not a formal paper, but posted on our class bulletin board):

Probably one of the most controversial research reports of all times in the great BSN versus ADN entry level debate among nursing academia is the Aiken study. This one research study was the major catalyst for the Institute of Medicine (IOM) calling for a ratio of 60% BSN and 40% ADN/ diploma in the North Carolina nursing workforce.

Study Design: quantitative, observational study with cross-section design

Objective: To examine whether the proportion of hospital RNs educated at the baccalaureate level or higher is associated with risk-adjusted mortality and failure to rescue (deaths in surgical patients with serious complications).

Purpose: "We tested whether hospitals with higher proportions of direct-care RNs educated at the baccalaureate level or above have lower risk-adjusted mortality rates and lower rates of failure to rescue (deaths in patients with serious complications). We also examined whether the educational backgrounds of hospital RNs are a predictor of patient mortality beyond factors such as nurse staffing and experience. These findings offer insights into the potential benefits of a more highly educated nurse workforce."

Conclusion: In hospitals with higher proportions of nurses educated at the baccalaureate level or higher, surgical patients experienced lower mortality and failure-to-rescue rates.

"Our findings indicate that surgical patients cared for in hospitals in which higher proportions of direct-care RNs held bachelor's degrees experienced a substantial survival advantage over those treated in hospitals in which fewer staff nurses had BSN or higher degrees. Similarly, surgical patients experiencing serious complications during hospitalization were significantly more likely to survive in hospitals with a higher proportion of nurses with baccalaureate education."

"Nursing education policy reports published in the past decade concluded that the United States has an imbalance in the educational preparation of its nurse workforce with too few RNs with BSN and higher degrees. Our findings provide sobering evidence that this imbalance may be harming patients."

Sampling plan:
Cross-sectional analyses of outcomes data for 232,342 general, orthopedic, and vascular surgery patients discharged from 168 non-federal adult general Pennsylvania hospitals between April 1, 1998, and November 30, 1999, linked to administrative and survey data providing information on educational composition, staffing, and other characteristics.

The authors analyzed outcomes data derived from hospital discharge abstracts that were merged with information on the characteristics of the treating hospitals, including unique data obtained from surveys of hospital nurses. The institutional review board of the University of Pennsylvania approved the study protocol.

Voluntary, anonymous survey: Questionnaires sent to 50% random sample of RNs residing in Pennsylvania and on the rolls of the Pennsylvania Board of Nursing; surveys completed by 10,184 nurses, a 52% response rate (which averaged more than 60 nurses per hospital).

Random selection of participants with 52% response rate.
Very large achieved sample: 10,184
Researchers indicated no response bias from the relatively low 52% response rate achieved sample. "Demographic characteristics of the respondents paralleled those of Pennsylvania hospital nurses in the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses" in terms of average ages, working full-time, and having a BSN degree (30% and 31% respectively).

Descriptive statistics (means, SDs, percentages, chi-square, and F tests) were used to compare groups of hospitals that varied in terms of their educational composition on hospital characteristics, including nurse experience and nurse staffing, and patient characteristics.

Logistic regression models were used to estimate the effects of a 10% increase in the proportion of nurses who had a bachelor's or master's degree on patient mortality and failure to rescue, and the estimate the effects of nurse staffing, nurse experience, and surgeon board certification.

The probabilities of poor outcomes were calculated for patient in hospitals assuming that 20%, 40%, and 60% of the hospital RNs held bachelor's or master's degrees and under various patient-to-nurse ratios.

Possible confounding variables and biases:
Selection bias: BSN, MSN, nurses with doctorates all grouped together; ADN's and diploma nurses grouped together (Pennsylvania has one of the highest populations of diploma nurses in the US).

This factor alone seriously compromises the study's generalizability to a target population of just ADNs and just BSNs and produces flawed methodology for the study conclusions.

It was not known how many nurses in the sample were originally ADN nurses who went back to get their BSN's (the BSN sample likely has nurses with more education and experience than the ADN's).

Need to factor out the experience variable.

Aiken noted the study found nursing experience was not associated with lower mortality rates of patients. "It's the educational level that's important and experience alone cannot achieve the same level of benefit for the patient as education plus experience," she said.

This is flawed methodology, because many BSN nurses were originally ADN nurses who went back to get their BSN's. The opposite is not true- BSN's don't go back to get their ADN. For an accurate comparison, need to compare strictly new ADN graduates with BSN graduates and patient outcomes.

Another possible confounding variable:

Patients admitted to a high tech and/or teaching hospital by virtue of the type of hospital have a better chance of survival. These hospitals often employ higher percentages of BSN and higher degree nurses than smaller outlying hospitals.

Are the researchers adequately controlling for patient acuity level?
The article noted control of acuity level, but no explanation was given for how this was done.

Nurse patient ratios:
BSN/ MSN nurses tended to work in the high tech/ teaching hospitals and to have lower ratios of nurse to patient 4:1 as compared with the ADN at 8:1.


This highlights the danger of institutions making practice recommendations on the basis of the findings of one, unreplicated study, especially if the study involved has serious biases and flaws in methodology.

References

Aiken, L.H., Clarke, S.P., Cheung, R.B., Sloane, D.M., & Silber, J.H. (2003). Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 12, 1617-1623.

Bernier, S. (2003). N-OADN update: JAMA Article “Educational Levels of Hospital Nurses and Surgical Patient Mortality."

North Carolina Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2004, March). Executive summary: Final report of the Task Force on the North Carolina Nursing Workforce.

Top
  #2  
Old Aug 09, 2006, 02:32 PM
VickyRN's Avatar
Nursing Champion
Join Date: Mar 2001
Re: Research Critique

How to make sense of clinical research

After reading this article, you should be able to:
1. Compare and contrast the case-control study, the case report, the case series, the cohort study, the meta-analysis, the randomized controlled trial, and the systematic review.
2. Describe the components of a research article.
3. Describe how to evaluate a research study.

Top
  #3  
Old Dec 11, 2006, 02:26 PM
VickyRN's Avatar
Nursing Champion
Join Date: Mar 2001
Re: Research Critique

Originally Posted by holmespretty View Post
Any example on how to review the Book of Daniel, Cahpter 1:1-17?
The Book of Daniel is Scripture, not a research article. In reviewing the book of Daniel, you would not apply the same principles used in a research critique, as the Old Testament is an entirely different type of literature.

Here are some links which may be of benefit to you:

GIRS Summary Studies in Reformed Theology: Interpreting Scripture
http://www.biblical-solutions.org/re...rmeneutics.pdf
Hermeneutics

Top
  #4  
Old Dec 11, 2006, 06:39 PM
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Re: Research Critique

Here's a basic outline to how to critique an article: http://www.pitt.edu/~nurcours/nur200...eFinal0502.pdf

Top

The following member says Thank You:
  #5  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 11:04 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
article and research study on open visiting hours

hi i am one os the post basic student. if any of yu can help on any article on open visiting hours. asap

Top
  #6  
Old Sep 18, 2007, 05:20 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Re: Research Critique

This article is helpful!

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...n9318493/print

Good luck

Top
  #7  
Old Oct 25, 2007, 08:39 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Re: Research Critique

Does anyone know where I can view other samples of critique research papers.

Top
Sponsored Links
 
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Research critique cecipun Graduate Student Nurse Forum: MSN/DNP/PhD 12 Aug 02, 2008 07:24 PM
Help Need Research proposal and critique cindybr76 Research - Nursing 4 Jul 19, 2008 05:47 PM
critique research paper somoggyi Nursing Student Assistance Forums 1 Mar 29, 2008 08:16 PM


Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



New To Site?
Need Help?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.

Research Critique

Copyright © 1996-2008, allnurses.com. All rights reserved.  allnurses.com, Inc. Advertising Information