I'm looking for some thoughts on a question I brought up on a similar forum. I'm currently working at a hospital (i have only been here 4 months) where they are re-writing a policy for pitocin infusion primarily for cost effective measures, obviiously not patient safety! The way that I have always admin pitocin (6 yrs at another hospital in LDRP) was having a mainline of LR to the patient (via pump or free flow), then putting pitocin on its OWN line and pump(or double pump) and attaching that line to the closest port on the primary line closest to the patient. Now i am seeing nurses running a main line of LR into a pump but then instead of putting pit on its own line they are putting the pit on a "secondary set" and piggying into the LR above the pump and using the secondary (or B side) of the pump to control it. This started happening when DPH was around and they were requiring the LR to be on a pump(good idea!) but we did not have enough pumps so some nurses started doing this. Now because of this the new policy is going to be pitocin on a secondary set! Sooo my question to you all is...what is your thoughts and practice on this (am I just over worrying!) and do you know of any articles or links to acog or awhonn that would support my argument of the safety issues in piggybacking pitocin to a mainline ABOVE the pump. oh and fyi the old policy at this hospital stated that the pit should always be run on its own line through the pump and piggyed into the distal port of the primary line. Funny how money trumps safety!!