Nursing Jobs
|
|
Job Seeker:
Employer:
|
How-To allnurses |
 |
|
Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
The largest most active online nursing community. Join 304,125 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.
|
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.

Nov 04, 2006, 12:21 PM
|
|
|
We recently had a meeting at work and one of the nurses brought up the fact that there are actual guidelines for patient/nurse ratios in mother/baby and that if our assignment is higher than set guidelines, we can personally be sued if there were a problem. I guess the point is that the staffing should be 3 -4 mother/baby couplets, max. And if one patient is high-risk (mag patient, hemorrhage or AP, etc) then there should be no more than 3 couplets, including the high risk patient.
I know that there is a lot of under-staffing in nursing in general, that is no surprise. What surprises me is that we are liable if our assignment is too heavy and there is an incident. We can't refuse our assignments, because then we will have no nurses. We are not unioninzed although there are whispers now about possibly considering it.
What to do about this? We can't force management to hire more nurses, although I wish we could.
I know maternity has one the highest risks for lawsuits but is it that way in other specialties? Has anyone ever had a problem where a nurse was held liable in the case of too-high patient load? How does your hospital handle it?
RIght now we have approximately 300 - 400 births/month, with 29 postpartum beds. I am not sure how many nurses, but there are usually 5 - 7 on per shift, includes nursery nurse. (Sometimes we borrow one from labor floor, sometimes we just shut down the nursery) Usually one or two techs, and a secretary about half the time. We all have to take call time too, which I didn't realize is not standard practice for other floors.
I am starting to wonder if working here is a risk to my license. We are a great group, teamwork is huge, we have a great local reputation for our maternity care, and we haven't had any incidents that I know of. I just wonder if its safe for my license here. The other night I had an ap with kidney stones and pain issues, a mag patient on hourly checks and her baby, a relatively new admit from a couple hours before me and her baby, and I admitted another couplet as well. I was busy and I handled it fine...but was I safe?
|

Nov 04, 2006, 05:30 PM
|
|
|
Good question... we are over the recommended ratios alot too. I haven't really had it much because I'm new and they are taking it easy on me so far but I know it won't last. But it seems like everyone has staffing problems, so...
|

Nov 04, 2006, 06:29 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
No you can't force management to hire more nurses but if you did go ahead and unionize you could get the ratios enforced as part of the union contract and perhaps more RN's would consider working there. Apparently the nurse ratio law in California has made a significant impact on recruitment and retention. I'm not a legal expert but I understand that if your unit is operating at a level below the generally accepted standard of care, you need to report it to your manager and/or risk management to avoid a malpractice claim against you.
I think that the worst thing you can do in this situation is nothing -good luck in standing up for yourself, your colleagues and your patients.
|

Nov 04, 2006, 06:29 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
sorry duplicate post
Last edited by UKRNinUSA : Nov 04, 2006 at 07:05 PM.
|

Nov 04, 2006, 06:29 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
sorry triplicate post
Last edited by UKRNinUSA : Nov 04, 2006 at 07:05 PM.
|

Nov 05, 2006, 09:54 PM
|
|
|
CoopergrrlRN, that sounds like a heavy load for someone with only 5 months experience! The legal ratio in CA is 4 mother baby couples per RN. We are also over sometimes when we relieve each other for breaks but our hospital tries really hard to keep the ratios safe. Have you approached your shift lead when you have an assignment like that? I don't think you have to "refuse" the assignment but it helps if you tell someone you aren't comfortable with the acuity of the patients you have. Nothing has happened yet.....but why wait until something does happen? Then everyone is sorry and you end up in a law suit! Just remember how hard you worked for that license!! I only have a year and a half experience and I still wouldn't take the assignment you had!
|

Nov 05, 2006, 10:52 PM
|
|
|
Originally Posted by MamaMadge
CoopergrrlRN, that sounds like a heavy load for someone with only 5 months experience! The legal ratio in CA is 4 mother baby couples per RN. We are also over sometimes when we relieve each other for breaks but our hospital tries really hard to keep the ratios safe. Have you approached your shift lead when you have an assignment like that? I don't think you have to "refuse" the assignment but it helps if you tell someone you aren't comfortable with the acuity of the patients you have. Nothing has happened yet.....but why wait until something does happen? Then everyone is sorry and you end up in a law suit! Just remember how hard you worked for that license!! I only have a year and a half experience and I still wouldn't take the assignment you had!
The thing is that we all had crappy assignments. There were four ap's on the floor all together, and some others w. stuff going on as well. That assignement I mentioned, I left out that one of the babies was not doing well either, kept haveing temp drops.
I was reading another thread...I can't believe that there are other hospitals where the ap's and mag pts etc don't even go to the postpartum floor. I mean I believe it, but I can't believe its that way where I am! We are probably the second or third smallest maternity unit out of the 4 local hospitals and we only have 6 beds in our special care unit; no NICU. But the moderate risk ap's and the pp's with issues still come to us. A few weeks ago, we admitted someone with an increased bp TWO WEEKS after delivery for mag (yea I got her) And the other night, a C-sect came to ED 2 weeks after discharge with what they called a late-onset hemorrhage and retained clots. Her crit was 23, for some reason they felt she needed to be on our floor, and also receive a transfusion....yep, I got her too. (We normally don't transfuse higher than 20 but I guess the ED docs felt different) Don't get me wrong, the nurses I work with are awesome and they help me whenever I need it. I guess I should say that I am glad to get so much experience out of the realm of routine PP care. We also get any ap's who are more than 16-18 weeks, no matter what their issue. Like the ap w/ kidney stones, she went for surgery (can't remember the name of it, I think ureteroscopy? and another surgical procedure, came back to our floor, found out the surgery was NOT successful and was going for stent placement and again to our floor. Seriously, she did not need maternity care. Q4h doptone FHT's can be done on any floor and the fetus wasn't viable anyway so the question of monitoring fetal heart tones is up in the air. But that's how our hospital does it.
hmm..maybe I should move to CA?
|

Nov 06, 2006, 02:54 PM
|
|
|
hmm..maybe I should move to CA?[/quote]
CoopergrrlRN....come on over!!! We could use you! The weather is great, it's a little expensive to live here but a very good overall quality of life!
We also get all of the AP's that have any type of problem at all! No matter what the issue, if they are pregnant at all we get them....oh well, good to brush up on those med-surg skills right?
|

Nov 06, 2006, 11:18 PM
|
|
|
lol yup. Tonight for some unknown reason I had a TAH w/ BSO....
|

Nov 07, 2006, 09:35 AM
|
|
|
You're stuck between a rock and a hard place!
There are patient ratio standards that are set from ACOG and AWHONN.
However, try to get a hospital to abide by them is another thing.
Management (and I think particularly in OB) just assumes that we will suck it up, go without breaks/lunch to give our patients good care. How many times do you ever get out on time? You give all to the patients and there's nothing left for yourself.
I work in a hospital w/a union. I've not seen much difference. We're still understaffed, overworked, burned out. We could refuse an assignment, house supervisor would be called (the usual chain of command).....
but what had are they going to pull the extra nurses out off? It's not like you can take a med/surg nurse and instantly teach her labor or even post partum.
I'm not sure what the answer is, or even if there is one.
|
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|