Nursing Jobs
|
|
Job Seeker:
Employer:
|
How-To allnurses |
 |
|
Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
The largest most active online nursing community. Join 311,468 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.
|
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.

May 11, 2007, 09:50 AM
|
|
|
Help with Apgar Scoring
|
|
I have worked Labor and Delivery for @ 6 years. Our department has all LDRP's and all nurses function in labor, delivery, pp and newborn care. I recently had a new grad midwife question my Apgar score on a delivery. I scored 8 and 9 apgars counting off for color. The midwife says that you can't give a 0 for color if you give a 2 for heart rate and respirations.
I count 1 for color if the infant is pink centrally w/acrocyanosis and I count a 0 for color if there is any central cyanosis (circum-oral included). I have practiced this way for my entire career and have never had anyone question my scoring. Every APGAR chart I find is unspecific, it say 0 for apperance if the infant is blue/pale, and 1 for color if pink with blue hands and feet.
My rationale is if there is any central cyanosis, it doesn't fall under the 1 category? Am I wrong? I am willing to change my practice if I can find documentation to back it. Any help will be appreciated.
|

May 11, 2007, 10:28 AM
|
 |
Chilling out
|
|
|
Re: Help with Apgar Scoring
|
|
NRP has always preached to us that if a baby is pink, and vigorous that you can assume the HR is >100. However, I have seen many babies come into this world very pale/blue but RR>30 and HR >100. These are usually the ones that are alert but haven't cried yet, in my experience. Once they cry they pink right up and bam! another 1-2 apgar points.
You score what you see. If she were doing the apgars, she would score what she sees. I don't see as how you're doing anything wrong. JMO.
|

May 11, 2007, 08:20 PM
|
 |
RNC
|
|
|
Re: Help with Apgar Scoring
|
|
That's the way I did apgars.
|

May 11, 2007, 08:48 PM
|
 |
SAHM wannabe
|
|
|
Re: Help with Apgar Scoring
|
|
Your midwife doesn't make sense.
You score what you see. You did the right thing.
steph
|

May 11, 2007, 10:56 PM
|
|
|
Re: Help with Apgar Scoring
|
|
Sounds like a certain midwife is trying to make numbers look better!!
It is not uncommon for a kid to have a HR >100 and be screaming but still be blue as a goose. It has to do with transition of blood flow more so than RR and HR.
I have been told by many-a-docs that a 10/10 apgar is impossible, that fetal transition does not happen that fast.
You go right ahead and chart what you see..... it is YOUR call!!!
|

May 11, 2007, 11:44 PM
|
 |
Temper-MENTAL Redhead
|
|
|
Re: Help with Apgar Scoring
|
|
What the others said. Score what YOU see. And chart it that way.
|

May 12, 2007, 03:19 AM
|
|
|
Re: Help with Apgar Scoring
|
|
Our charting system says 'centrally pink with blue extremities' = 1. Acrocyanosis is a normal newborn finding. I don't count off for that.
|

May 12, 2007, 09:19 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
Re: Help with Apgar Scoring
|
|
I have had OBs get really mad at my APGARs, especially with a bad baby. A couple have told me that this is their "report card" of how well the labor/delivery went, and who doesn't want to do well on their report card?
I read a study that said the delivering person should never give the baby Apgars, because they are always higher than they should be. I will try to find it and post it here.
I give out more 10s than a lot of the nurses I work with, but it has been very rare that I have given, or seen 10/10s. Most babies just don't transition that fast. I usually give 8 for 1 minute, counting off either 2 for color (I count central cyanosis as 2) or 1 off for color and 1 off for tone. Now, if this isn't the case I give what I see. I have given 9/10 and 10/10, but I don't think it happens often. Then again, some of the nurses I work with "knee-jerk it" and give 8/9 for all health babies.
|

May 14, 2007, 12:10 AM
|
|
|
Re: Help with Apgar Scoring
|
|
I agree, chart what you see. I've never actually given a 10/10. Never had a baby that I thought deserved it. I have given a few 9/10s, and quite a few 9/9s. It is frustrating when the doctor/midwife tries to argue Apgars. After all, you're the one that's right there with the baby while they're busy attending to mom. And yes, babies can have a HR>100 and still deserve a 0 for color.
|

May 14, 2007, 05:24 PM
|
|
|
Re: Help with Apgar Scoring
|
|
To those who dont count acrocyanosis, although it may be a normal finding, it is still (according to NRP, the standard reference for APGAR scoring) counted as a 1. Central cyanosis at 1 min is not really such an abnormal finding either. Some kids may take longer than one minute to transition....
I assume if NRP says to count acro as a 1, then acro should be a 1. How is this less important than scoring 2 for the HR when it is not above 100? If we do apgar scoring "cafateria style," it takes away from the validity of the scoring.
|
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|