#1 Nursing Community for Nurses: 312,644 Members

Log in   Sign up   Why join?   | Layout: Switch to narrow layout Color: gold style blue style rose style
Nursing Community for Nurses
Home Forums Articles Specialty Students Region Career Resources

Advanced Search Site Help Site Map

Family history - irrelevant in modern obstetrics?



Currently Online
Members: 303
Guests: 1,993
2,296

Job Spotlight
ER & L&D RN
Houston, Texas
Administrator
Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
Forum Spotlight
Distance Learning for Nursing

Nursing Degrees

Nursing Articles

Funny Nursing Stories
The Case Of The Missing Dentures
Funny Nursing Stories
Funny Nursing Stories
Funny Nursing Stories
Be Kind to Co-workers, Or Else
Fixodent or Forget it!
Me and Mr. Smith and Waffles
How quickly we forget.
It is my X-ray
Submit An Article

Nursing Jobs

Job Seeker: Employer:

Scrubs & Gear

Newsletter

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the free allnurses.com Nurse-zine Newsletter.

Enter email address:


Read current:
Nursing Newsletter

How-To allnurses

allnurses videos

Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses

The largest most active online nursing community. Join 312,644 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.

Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Oct 16, 2004, 02:47 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Family history - irrelevant in modern obstetrics?

I recall that when I was pregnant with my own children (my youngest is almost 13) I was asked many questions about my mother's obstetric history. Is it because there are so many tests available now to directly determine the well-being of mother and foetus that these questions are no longer asked or did family histories just turn out to be an inaccurate way of predicting the likelihood of specific events occuring during pregnancy, labour, and delivery?

Top
  #2  
Old Oct 16, 2004, 09:22 AM
traumaRUs's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2000

Good question. I had my two sons in 1980 and 1985 and no one asked about anything except my own history.

Top
  #3  
Old Oct 16, 2004, 11:54 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004

I was asked my mother's obstetric history. Turned out to be quite relevant. Pre-e *may* run in families. My mother had a moderate case with me. I had SEVERE pre-e/HELLP with all 3 of my pregnancies.

Top
  #4  
Old Oct 16, 2004, 07:41 PM
SmilingBluEyes's Avatar
SmilingBluEyes (Female)
Temper-MENTAL Redhead
Join Date: Apr 2002

NO NOT IRRELEVANT> we DO take family histories and take them into consideration in treating OUR OB patients. And so do our doctors!

Top
  #5  
Old Oct 16, 2004, 08:47 PM
kids's Avatar
*~*~*
Join Date: Oct 2001

During my daughter's pregnancy she started her care at a OB clinic for low to no income women. I have a pretty serious OB/Gyn history including probable DES exposure. My daughter was told that none of it mattered.

Mid-point in the pregnancy she changed providers to a private ON/Gyn practice.
Her new doc felt my history was significant to her prenatal care...based on my history a couple of tests were done, problems were detected and intervention probably prevented them from becoming serious.

Top
  #6  
Old Oct 16, 2004, 09:50 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004

I have a pretty serious OB/Gyn history including probable DES exposure. My daughter was told that none of it mattered.
Now that's scary.

I'm somewhat tempted to ask what drug is used for third stage management at the hospital where my daughter will be delivering. When I had my son, the hospital routinely administered ergometrine - to which I had a dangerous reaction. I'm pretty sure most hospitals here use syntocinon now, but I should probably check.

Top
  #7  
Old Oct 16, 2004, 10:11 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001

OMG!!! Kids-r-fun, that's awful!! A DES daughter is nothing to take lightly. That's horrid. Family history is relevant. However, I don't know about you, but I'm a firm believer that how mom/sister labored means jack about how pt. will labor.

If it were always true that you labored like your mother, I would have had a short labor and pushed out a 7lb. baby like it was nothing. Instead I had an almost 9lb. baby via c-section. Where the heck was that good ol' genetic karma, man?

Top
  #8  
Old Oct 16, 2004, 10:45 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000

I don't think it's completely irrelevant, but it seldom changes our management of the patient either. We always err on the side of caution.

Top
  #9  
Old Oct 17, 2004, 03:12 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004

Originally Posted by fergus51
I don't think it's completely irrelevant, but it seldom changes our management of the patient either. We always err on the side of caution.
The only thing which really concerns me is the possibility of a drug reaction if ergometrine is used for third stage management. Reactions to other drugs are fairly consistent among the females in my family.

In all likelihood (grandbaby is being delivered in a hospital based birth centre), there'll be no need for active third stage management, but in the event that there is such a need it would be nice to avoid the potential problem of her diastolic BP going through the roof as mine did (it was not mismanagement in my case - ergometrine was routinely used at that time and there was no particular reason to believe that I was at increased risk from it; to this day, my medical files are flagged to ensure that I'm never given it again ).

I think that I'll probably mention it at the next antenatal appointment. That's the one where my daughter will be drawing up her birth plan and so third stage management will be under discussion anyway. For a while, most hospitals were using syntocinon routinely and only administering ergometrine for PPH, but from what I've read ergometrine is coming back into favour so it at least makes sense to find out about the standing orders at this particular facility.

Top
  #10  
Old Oct 25, 2004, 05:42 PM
Mermaid4's Avatar
Mother/BabyRN
Join Date: Aug 2004

WHAT?????? I always ask because I have found, even though most of our docs disagree, that a woman often has a similar labor history as her mother, and more than once, because I bothered to ask, I have discovered that a patient was adopted....

Top
Sponsored Links
 
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Independent Health & Family History Study ~~ NightMARE!!! Raevyn General Nursing Student Discussion 2 Sep 23, 2007 12:20 PM


Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



New To Site?
Need Help?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.

Family history - irrelevant in modern obstetrics?

Copyright © 1996-2008, allnurses.com. All rights reserved.  allnurses.com, Inc. Advertising Information