it's too bad the title of the article wanted to sensationalize the whole thing and was so inflammatory.
when I read the entire article it seemed to me that the docs wanted to increase profits and KNEW hiring an unlicensed PA was wrong...why else did they try to cover up for 16 months? Fishy fishy fishy
I don't know why this Herranz was there, I wonder if they meant uncertified vs. unlicensed? I know some uncertified PAs who were grandfathered in ages ago, because they came over as foreign doctors. They are PA but not PA-C and can work. Maybe this Herranz misrepresented himself or his credentials, but it seems unlikely given how long the ED group tried to cover it up...?
why didn't they include "doctors' greed" up in the title too?