[NRSKarenRN]

Came across this while link hopping tonight...

Thought provoking article...

To Unionize or Not To Unionize:
Questions that every nurse should ask themselves

[ZASHAGALKA]

Well, I will say that the article is decidedly anti-union, for all her assurances to the contrary.

Unions have their place. But, they are an additional layer of management. Sometimes, nurses need that filter. Other times, that filter is just another layer of management.

I still believe that a strong professional organization is the way to go. Not all nurses need to sell some of their real freedoms for unions. Some do.

But, all nurses need a national voice. Even if all nurses were unionized this year, it would still only result in a conglomeration of voices, each with their own separate agendas, and many of them in direct competition and contention with each other.

Investing our 'voice' in a professional organzation would avoid some of those pitfalls.

Wish we had one. Beginning to get the ideas in my head to gauge the cost of spearheading one.

~faith,
Timothy.

[pickledpepperRN]

It certainly is. The author wrote for this site:
http://www.notinourhouse.org/

Scroll down for the Geneviève M. Clavreul, RN, Ph.D anti union nurses writing.

She also writes for "Working Nurse"
In this article her observations are accurate.
But I disagree with the solution to an unsafe hospital with management that punishes nurses for patient advocacy and trying to improve patient care.
She advocates documentation (good), quiting, and still doing nothing unless the hospital gets caught due to a publicised tragedy.
Why not work together with colleagues in collective action to stop unsafe, immoral, illegal practices?
http://www.workingworld.com/magazine...cleno=333&wn=1

[cateccrn]

I have always been and continue to be pro-union.
The threats, unsubstanstiated rumors and coercion I and others experienced at the 1 non-union hospital I worked at will forever haunt me.
Not to mention the inability towards advancement despite qualifications based upon a managers paranoia. (And I can cite case upon case).

Basically, this hospital could not improve because any suggestion for improvement was seen as the managers failing to do the job in the first place.
So managers were loathe to report any failings.

So, reporters were seen as threatening troublemakers, and either demoted or fired.

Unions are not perfect, but I'll take them over the alternative...

[ZASHAGALKA]

Originally Posted by cateccrn

I have always been and continue to be pro-union.
The threats, unsubstanstiated rumors and coercion I and others experienced at the 1 non-union hospital I worked at will forever haunt me.
Not to mention the inability towards advancement despite qualifications based upon a managers paranoia. (And I can cite case upon case).

Basically, this hospital could not improve because any suggestion for improvement was seen as the managers failing to do the job in the first place.
So managers were loathe to report any failings.

So, reporters were seen as threatening troublemakers, and either demoted or fired.

Unions are not perfect, but I'll take them over the alternative...

Unions are a better alternative to bad management. But not all management is bad.

You cite an extreme example and, while your answer fits to THAT example, it simply doesn't apply to EVERY situation.

There are some distinct advantages to being in a union. But, there are also some distinct advantages in NOT being in a union. Each is a trade-off. Which trade-offs work best depends upon the situation.

~faith,
Timothy.

[cateccrn]

And I would like to know exactly what "Real Freedoms" I am selling out for uinion membership? A "Strong Professional Voice" is what we have been asking for the ANA for 25 years; yet all we keep hearing about is "Professional Licensure Status"
ANA has'nt done a darn thing to better your status in decades.
It is useless.
Since CNA has severed it's ties with ANA, it has come to the forefront in the fight for patient/nurse ratios; including the break/coverage regulations.
Notice you have a manager "out of care" lately?
Well thank CNA.

[cateccrn]

Timothy:
The question simply begs; what distinct advantages lie in NOT being union?
My situation was extreme, but given the fact that it was the ONLY hospital in the area that was NOT union, I believe it was a showplace for abuse.
This was the only hospital in the area to turn down 7 CCRN credentialed nurses (who were subsequently hires by 2 other area hospitals) without review. If this can hapen to a candidate, what do you think the annual review of competency of staff is like?

[burn out]

I am basically anti-union. I see unions as more middle management trying to secure their jobs and livilihood in the union. So far I doubt that a meat packers union or an electricaians union know a rats a## about nursing and therefore could not properly represent nurses. Having said that, I am not opposed to a professional nurses union for nurses only with only a nursing
agenda. I have not been impressed with ANA to join and am kind of ticked off having gone for a BS degree because I was lied to years ago by being told that in a few years there would not be any AD nurses. Maybe something new and fresh with a goal and plan and leadership by people with a vision on where nursing could and should be going would be worth a union.

[ZASHAGALKA]

Originally Posted by cateccrn

Timothy:
The question simply begs; what distinct advantages lie in NOT being union?
My situation was extreme, but given the fact that it was the ONLY hospital in the area that was NOT union, I believe it was a showplace for abuse.
This was the only hospital in the area to turn down 7 CCRN credentialed nurses (who were subsequently hires by 2 other area hospitals) without review. If this can hapen to a candidate, what do you think the annual review of competency of staff is like?

1. The freedom to work directly w/ supervisors on issues such as scheduling WITHOUT being pigeon-holed by contractual rules.

2. The ability to advance on merit, to 'shine', as opposed to advancement by seniorty.

3. Unions entrench seniority. As a junior employee, you 'sell' some of your rights to more 'senior' employees. Even if you are the 'best fit' for a job, that's not relevant to seniority. Being off on holidays, weekends, first crack at the schedule: in order to get the maximum benefit of a union, I have to bed myself with the management - through the union - for more than a decade.

One of nursing's greatest assets is mobility: I can work anywhere. You have to trade that mobility for seniority in order for unions to be a distinct advantage.

4. Unions promote a confrontational atmosphere towards management. That makes 'working relationships' more rare.

5. Unions, just like hospitals, are subject to 'bad' management.

6. Unions use dues for political purposes. You have to 'sell' your political freedom. EVEN IF YOU OPT OUT of that portion of your dues going to a specific candidate, the union uses your mere membership as the collective means to gain influence. If that influence is against your individual desires, you've given something up.

7. The greatest gains in nursing over the last decade is NOT from unions; it's from individual nurses 'voting with their feet' en masse. The greatest issue facing hospitals is 'recruitment and retention'. Unions stiffle the real incentives and ground being made in this area BECAUSE a contract prevents such innovation.

8. Dues themselves deflate nursing salaries. If the union gets 80 bucks/month, that is an 80 dollar deflation in real wages.

9. Unions represent another layer of management with all the bureaucracy that entails.

'Begs the question' refers to the logical fallacy of a circular argument. I made no such circular argument. Your question didn't 'beg'.

I made no attack on unions. Don't bother to point out that NOT being in a union can have disadvantages. I never denied that. I SAID both unions and non-union environments involve trade-offs. EACH have their advantages, AND disadvantages.

As such, the chief test of the necessity of a union is IF the advantages of being in one OUTWEIGHS the disadvantages. And, vice-versa.

Your post points outs out a SPECIFIC circumstance where the advantages of unionizing would outweigh the disadvantages. I believe I said that. That is not always the case.

It's simply biased propaganda to suggest that unions are an all-encompassing panacea with NO downsides. OF COURSE THE SAME WOULD BE TRUE IF THAT ARGUMENT WERE MADE FOR NON-UNION ENVIRONMENTS. I never said otherwide.

~faith,
Timothy.

[pickledpepperRN]

Originally Posted by ZASHAGALKA

It's simply biased propaganda to suggest that unions are an all-encompassing panacea with NO downsides. OF COURSE THE SAME WOULD BE TRUE IF THAT ARGUMENT WERE MADE FOR NON-UNION ENVIRONMENTS. I never said otherwide.

~faith,
Timothy.

Yup!