Originally Posted by forrester
Curious that the UAN is just now getting around to caring about staffing ratios. Or is this a yearly survey?
Wonder what prompted this global concern?
The UAN has been caring about staffing ratios (and more) since its inception.
At its first National Labor Assembly meeting in 2000, UAN delegates launched a year-long public awareness campaign on the nurse staffing crisis and expanded the campaign in 2001.
http://www.uannurse.org/who/resolution/2000/20.html
http://www.uannurse.org/who/resolution/2001/11.html
The legislative platform adopted at the first (2000) meeting included:
-Revision of Health Care Financing Agency (HCFA) Conditions of Participation to Include Safe Staffing Requirements
-Initiatives to Ensure Universal Health Care Coverage
-Education and Mobilization of Nurses Regarding Single Payer
In 2002, the UAN delivered testimony to the IOM on patient safety and the work environment of RNs which included staffing ratios.
http://www.uannurse.org/media/press....d=70&year=2002
From UAN president, Cheryl Johnson's 2003 press release concerning the IOM Report:
Johnson specifically highlighted the report's emphasis on safe staffing: "We know from our own polling and research at UAN that staff nurses place a top priority on having a safe, minimum nurse-to-patient staffing ratio in delivering quality care...Johnson added that a federally mandated nurse-to-patient ratio will serve to set a nationwide, minimum staffing standard to ensure patients receive adequate care.
The latest survey coincided with the re-introduction of national nurse staffing ratio legislation which is supported by the UAN (as well as other national unions and nursing organizations). The bill is H.R. 2123, Nurse Staffing Standards for Patient Safety and Quality Care Act of 2007. It currently has 48 co-sponsors.
http://www.uannurse.org/legislative/bill.html
I've posted information about this legislation, and the UAN's support of it, in various threads on this forum and have also asked why CNA is not supporting this legislation, but have not received any response. Isn't CNA supposed to part of the AFL's "RNs Working Together" Industrial Coordinating Committee? Its members should know about this legislation if they are a part of that.
Elsewhere on this board, CNA has claimed to be the only organizaton, other than Massachusetts, to be working on state staffing ratio legislation. This is not true but seems to be a useful organizing tool for CNA. I'm all for organizing more nurses into unions, and applaud CNA as a leader in the staffing ratio arena. But it seems if it's not CNA's baby, it's not worth their attention here. If CNA could put aside it's own need to be number one for a legislative session or two, maybe we could see some real progress for staff nurses.
How about it?? Can we use this board to really get 'RNs working together' on national nursing issues like staffing ratios, mandatory overtime, the RESPECT act, as well as single payer??