#1 Nursing Resource: 8 Million pageviews per month

Log in   Sign up   Why join?   | Layout: Switch to narrow layout Color: gold style blue style rose style
Nursing Community for Nurses
Home Forums Articles Specialty Students Region Career Resources

Advanced Search Site Help Site Map

to sedate or not to sedate...



Currently Online
Members: 245
Guests: 1,899
2,144

Job Spotlight
ER & L&D RN
Houston, Texas
Forum Spotlight
Distance Learning for Nursing

Nursing Degrees

Nursing Articles

It is my X-ray
Thanksgiving Humor
Halloween Humor
Night Nurse III: Slip-Slidin' Awaaaaaaay
Lights out
Stand at attention!!!
2 am admission
funny nursing stories
Night Nurse II: I Tawt I Taw A Puddy-Tat!
Orientation Day LPN to RN
Submit An Article

Nursing Jobs

Job Seeker: Employer:

Scrubs & Gear

Newsletter

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the free allnurses.com Nurse-zine Newsletter.

Enter email address:


Read current:
Nursing Newsletter

How-To allnurses

allnurses videos

Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses

The largest most active online nursing community. Join 311,267 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.

Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Dec 06, 2005, 11:10 PM
dfk
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
to sedate or not to sedate...

at my facility, anesthesia does not sedate during intubation.. the patient is fully awake, writhing, looks uncomfortable and probably in pain through the whole process.. when i ask them why not some propofol or whatever, they say it's better/safer for the patient, i.e. aspiration or the like. at this point, i say, what's the difference, they end up on sedation as soon as the tube is in. i shake my head in disgust. if there's one thing that bothers me the most at my job, is this. your thoughts?

Top
  #2  
Old Dec 06, 2005, 11:16 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Re: to sedate or not to sedate...

We always sedate, unless the pt is already unresponsive. Seems like they'll do less gagging if they're sedated, therefore less likely to vomit.

Top
  #3  
Old Dec 07, 2005, 09:42 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Angry Re: to sedate or not to sedate...

It is unconscionable not to sedate. How would the anesthesiologist like it if it was done to him/her? Did Saddam Hussein teach them intubation skills?

You are absolutely right about the sedation. That's why we suction and put the head of the bed up/ng tube/whatever.

Perhaps your nurse manager could address this and supply some type of information/standard of care to the docs. We are our patient's advocates!

Top
  #4  
Old Dec 07, 2005, 10:11 AM
ZASHAGALKA's Avatar
ZASHAGALKA (Male)
Who's John Galt
Join Date: May 2005
Re: to sedate or not to sedate...

1. I would certainly refuse to participate on ethical grounds.

2. I would refer every instance for ethics review.

3. I would demand evidence based research on that rationale.

~faith,
Timothy.

Top
  #5  
Old Dec 07, 2005, 10:25 AM
Dinith88 (Male)
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Re: to sedate or not to sedate...

Originally Posted by ZASHAGALKA
1. I would certainly refuse to participate on ethical grounds.

2. I would refer every instance for ethics review.

3. I would demand evidence based research on that rationale.

~faith,
Timothy.

Just like he said...

Top
  #6  
Old Dec 07, 2005, 01:36 PM
dfk
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Re: to sedate or not to sedate...

i hear all of u.. it's the doctor's call, not our nurse mgr. (who just resigned - YAHOOOOO!!!) it seems to be somewhat of common practice from what i am gathering (doc wise). at this point, ethics committee won't get involved (the same nurse mgr that's resigning was on committee)- how funny is that? i'd be interested to take a poll of those that got tubed and ask of experience
r/t awake/asleep, and their thoughts. (not that breathing thru a large straw is not memorable enough!!) -

Top
  #7  
Old Dec 07, 2005, 02:00 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Re: to sedate or not to sedate...

Where ARE you practicing?

I just want to stay away.....

Top
  #8  
Old Dec 07, 2005, 05:53 PM
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Re: to sedate or not to sedate...

I am not sure this is an ethical issue either. There is no evidence that sedating a patient during intubation is helpful; it is just more comfort and it makes the procedure far easier - I have been in rooms when someone is getting intubated hundreds of times and when they are wide awake, it is next to impossible.

I would be interested in research based rationales for why they do not sedate during intubation. But I can understand why the ethical committee will not get involved, as uncomfortable as the procedure may be for patients.

Top
  #9  
Old Dec 07, 2005, 05:57 PM
ZASHAGALKA's Avatar
ZASHAGALKA (Male)
Who's John Galt
Join Date: May 2005
Re: to sedate or not to sedate...

Originally Posted by marissa81579
I am not sure this is an ethical issue either. There is no evidence that sedating a patient during intubation is helpful; it is just more comfort and it makes the procedure far easier - I have been in rooms when someone is getting intubated hundreds of times and when they are wide awake, it is next to impossible.

I would be interested in research based rationales for why they do not sedate during intubation. But I can understand why the ethical committee will not get involved, as uncomfortable as the procedure may be for patients.
I'm sure they would get involved if you accurately and assertively point out that JCAHO demands that measure be in place to ensure adequate and effective pain control.

Effective pain control is a nationwide directive from our governing body and failing to do so without good cause is a deviation and violation of our accreditation commitments.

It is an ethical issue. Needlessly submitting somebody to pain is unethical.

~faith,
Timothy.

Top
  #10  
Old Dec 07, 2005, 06:08 PM
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Re: to sedate or not to sedate...

I am well aware of JCAHO pain initiatives but it does not hurt to get intubated, it is simply uncomfortable - I think it is a matter of "best practice" - it sounds like the physicians at that hospital are afraid to sedate patients!

I am not advocating the behavior, I think it is awful. But there is nothing inherently painful about getting intubated, particularly since they numb people's throats before doing it also.

Discomforting feeling getting a tube shoved down your airway? Sure. But I don't discomfort equals pain. But I agree that patients should be sedated. But you can't lose sight of why they are sedated - it's done for ease of the whole process and so they won't remember it - not for strictly "pain control"

Top
Sponsored Links
 
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.



Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



New To Site?
Need Help?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.

to sedate or not to sedate...

Copyright © 1996-2008, allnurses.com. All rights reserved.  allnurses.com, Inc. Advertising Information