Originally Posted by ingelein
Yes, the "I've got mine so to heck with you" syndrome.
It's not necessarily that.
I think most Americans with health insurance are VERY cognizant of the fact that one catastrophic illness can wipe them out. I know
I am. I've been uninsured and underinsured during several periods of my adult life, and I've even been through a bankruptcy in part because of large medical bills I couldn't pay, despite a good income.
Yet I remain unconvinced that government control of health care is the way to solve inequities in the system. I do believe that health insurance companies need to be taken out of the equation entirely, for many, many reasons; however, I also fear that federal control of health policy would be disastrous.
Think about it for a minute: would those of you who are advocating for government-sponsored health care want the current administration to make healthcare decisions for you? The same administration that openly admits to spying on U.S. citizens, thinks it's above the law of the land, and trashes the Constitution in order to get what it wants? Are these the people you want in charge of YOUR medical care?
Even if we vote in a more moderate administration next fall, I still don't believe the feds are well-suited to making health policy. If government is to be involved in any way, I'd much rather see it at the state level, where policy makers are generally more aware of the distinct needs of their populations. Is it such a stretch to understand that Florida, which has a high census of elderly and a warm, humid climate, is going to have different needs than, say, North Dakota? It would be for the federal government, which tends to take a one-size-fits-all approach to almost everything it touches.
I don't have the answers, although I have plenty of ideas and a certainty that federal takeover of healthcare would interfere with our individual freedoms in a way that makes warrantless wiretapping look like a cakewalk.