Originally Posted by ♪♫ in my ♥
x_coastie, a more effective response would be to argue with the points made by the physician rather than to discount her views out of hand because you don't care for the political slant of the messenger.
Your desire to have certain states try single-payer is not a good one. If only one state did it then of course you'd have sick people migrating to that state to receive their medical care. It needs to be a national solution using the power of the federal government to regulate. The states simply don't have the power required to make it work.
I disagree. This is something that in my opinion has to be done on the state level. We need a state to set and example of how things CAN work, and on a smaller scale something this big can be managed more effectively (on par with the various western style nations that have a single payer system).
Yes you would have some flock to the state to get medical coverage, but you'd also see a huge shift in businesses to that state. Lets not forget the reason that some republicans are now seeing the light...the pressure put on the major corperations by health care adds on average 1,600 to a cost of a car, for example.
And California would be the perfect state to do such a thing, being the worlds 8th largest economy and a trendsetter in various ways. Likewise this could bring a big boom to various right-to-work southern states to keep unions less desireable. In addition, it would be easier to pull off even getting a single payer system started on a state level.
So coastie was right, just not in the selfish way they intended. It does stand to reason that we as nurses will take a significant cut in pay in a single payer system, just look at any other country with socialized medicine...but hey I didn't get into this profession for the money.
The following member says Thank You: