Nursing Jobs
|
|
Job Seeker:
Employer:
|
How-To allnurses |
 |
|
Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
The largest most active online nursing community. Join 294,489 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.
|
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.

Nov 14, 2006, 03:02 PM
|
|
|
Re: If money talks, why no universal healthcare?
|
|
Australia is going the other way. We've always had Medicare for everyone, and you pay a fee in your tax depending on income, for free care in public hospitals. You could then buy additional private health cover. Now however, if you're aged 30+ and you don't get private cover, you get penalized by having to pay a Medicare levy/penalty in addition to your regular Medicare tax.
I like our system, although it's increasingly difficult for public patients waiting for "elective" surgery to get hospital beds.
|

Nov 14, 2006, 03:30 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
Re: If money talks, why no universal healthcare?
|
|
Originally Posted by ZASHAGALKA
Because, as the 20th century amply showed, communism doesn't work, anywhere it's tried
Funny that, I purposefully DIDN'T use the phrase "socialized medicine" for fear that I would have the conservatives amongst us running for cover screaming "Aaaaargh, REDS UNDER THE BED" and look at that. It happened anyway. I'm so sorry to have frightened you Timothy, I really didn't mean to.
Listen carefully Timothy - "SOCIALIZED MEDICINE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH COMMUNISM". You can relax, it's just not true. You don't need to believe the lie anymore.
Are all the other industrialized nations in the world that have universal health care coverage communist? Japan? No. UK? No. Germany? No. Canada? No. etc etc. I just don't get the connection.
A single payor universal health care system is a health care payment NOT a health care delivery system - it remains a fee for service system. Just because the defense system is publicly subsidized, does that make it a Socialized Defense System?  Of course not. We all pay taxes, we all get defended because we all need defended, that's how it works. So as far as I know we all need healthcare (except for that cheerleader character on that TV show "Heroes"), we all (well most of us) pay taxes, so why don't we all get healthcare coverage?
Don't you feel that the current system discriminates against you - just because your not over 65 (or below 18, in some places), disabled, have a chronic medical condition or are poor you don't deserve to join this program. You have to pay for it, because you are keeping yourself healthy and being a productive member of society and paying your taxes. But, you, the person that is actually paying for the care of others, apparently does not deserve to participate in the same health care program. Again I don't get it - I'm losing while others are gaining and I'm playing by the rules.
|

Nov 14, 2006, 03:40 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
Re: If money talks, why no universal healthcare?
|
|
Originally Posted by BSNtobe2009
but I want to keep the healthcare the way it is...flaws and all.
I guess you didn't realise that the Medicare system is going to implode by 2019 due to lack of funding and that the corporations that provide these benefits and our jobs are going broke due to the increased expense of health care. Then what will we do? ( I'd be interested in your suggestions). We do not have a choice. We have to plan for the future now.
Last edited by UKRNinUSA : Nov 14, 2006 at 03:59 PM.
Reason: forgot something
|

Nov 14, 2006, 03:55 PM
|
|
|
Re: If money talks, why no universal healthcare?
|
|
Originally Posted by ZASHAGALKA
And the problem with our health-care system is because it's a 3rd party payor system, people have given up the responsibility to be part of their own health-care solutions.
How is bringing that 'full circle' a better solution?
What our healthcare system needs is some good ole capitalist reforms that make people, as you say, MORE connected to the process - not less.
The problem with 'standardized' healthcare is that 'standard' is all too often, quite substandard. No thanks.
What you fail to realize is that most people here wouldn't trust the gov't to take care of their dog. You aren't going to get a groundswell of American support to turn their healthcare over to such renowned inefficiency.
~faith,
Timothy.
Not trying to start an argument or flame here. Just a good old friendly debate
Yep, my brother-in-law, with a traumatic brain injury, sure failed to take care of his health. all his fault. You must still be young. Are you in perfect health? Is your weight within guidelines? Do you exercise at least 30 minutes every day of the week? Do you eat a healthy diet? Even if you do, can you guarantee that you are not going to have an accident or health related issue that might not just knock you to the ground? Do you have family or friends that will be willing to pick you up and support you?
Yep, I'm surely going to go for that preventative health care exam when I know I'll have to figure out who's going to give it to me at the cheapest rate, which I will then pay out of pocket. That little bit of unusual bleeding? Ah, probably not worth spending the $100 to get it checked out, until of course it becomes cancer and then will cost thousands more.
Yep, good old corporations can be entrusted to take care of people beyond their own fat cat CEO's. Those same wonderful companies outsourcing jobs by the thousands. if our healthcare is so superior, why do statistics and studies prove otherwise?
|

Nov 14, 2006, 03:58 PM
|
|
|
Re: If money talks, why no universal healthcare?
|
|
Originally Posted by UKRNinUSA
Listen carefully Timothy - "SOCIALIZED MEDICINE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH COMMUNISM". You can relax, it's just not true. You don't need to believe the lie anymore.
Are all the other industrialized nations in the world that have universal health care coverage communist? Japan? No. UK? No. Germany? No. Canada? No. etc etc. I just don't get the connection.
LOL
Timothy, are you a libertarian? Sink or swim baby? Get rid of that evil Government? All our wonderful corporations will just take care of us all?
|

Nov 14, 2006, 04:09 PM
|
|
|
Re: If money talks, why no universal healthcare?
|
|
Originally Posted by augigi
Australia is going the other way. We've always had Medicare for everyone, and you pay a fee in your tax depending on income, for free care in public hospitals. You could then buy additional private health cover. Now however, if you're aged 30+ and you don't get private cover, you get penalized by having to pay a Medicare levy/penalty in addition to your regular Medicare tax.
I like our system, although it's increasingly difficult for public patients waiting for "elective" surgery to get hospital beds.
Well, my mom is waiting well over two months for "elective" knee replacement.
I still don't believe people are dying waiting for care in Europe any more than they are in the US. That's been a myth told to us to scare us commies away from thinking we need some type of basic single payer medical coverage in this country.
I do understand there are difficulties in most "systems". I don't believe it's CAUSED by the government tho. I am not a raging socialist/communist. I beleive there are certain things that a civilized society believes it's citizens should have access to. No matter what, there are going to be people in ANY society that will not be able to "swim". Claiming that the governement paying a fee to a privately run health care system for coverage for all citizens means that the leeches will surface doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
|

Nov 14, 2006, 04:23 PM
|
|
|
Re: If money talks, why no universal healthcare?
|
|
Originally Posted by BSNtobe2009
I personally, don't want to see Universal Healthcare here. What I want, is for the drug companies to be more regulated and stop ripping off the public, and for it to be illegal to advertise ambulance chasing attorney's on TV. I don't think every mistake or error a doctor makes justifies a lawsuit, regardless of the outcome. Some of those people wouldn't get a dime if I was sitting on the jury and I would hold it out to the bitter end.
I worked at a pizza place in college and had a boss that had to bring his mother over from the UK and get a cholesteral plug removed from her jugler vein and paid CASH for it, b/c she was so far down the waiting list for a surgery that he feared she was going to die before she got the surgery.
I don't want the gov't controlling which doctor I see, or if I can get a second opinion or not.
I also don't want to pay the exhorbant taxes that comes with Universal Healthcare.
Citizens here in the USA complain about how much we pay in taxes, but for what we GET for our tax dollars flat out beats about any other industrialized country out there....and I love it.
I'm not bashing the UK, but I want to keep the healthcare the way it is...flaws and all.
You are already paying exhorbatant taxes for things other countires get that we don't have. People are mistaken if they believe we pay fewer taxes than Europe. We don't. And I'm sorry, we don't "get" a lot for our taxes. Our infrastructure is crumbling, we have no way around relying on foreign oil, no health coverage, etc. etc. They have a transport/rail system that makes this country look like a third world country. They have health coverage for citizens, imperfect as it might be. They have successful programs that keep troubled teens off the street in Germany, and provides education and training to ensure they become functioning adults. Their streets are clean and well maintained. You can't walk through San Francisco, which should be one of the most beautiful cities in the world, w/o stepping on a homeless person or their "droppings"....or various other piles of trash. Some of it is a difference in culture, some of it is tax dollars making sure things are kept up. I'm not saying problems are absent in Europe, but I see it on a smaller scale. We all have problems.
You don't think someone isn't controlling what doctor you see in our current "system"? You must either be paying for it yourself, or have really expensive insurance.
I agree that reform needs to be in place regarding lawsuits. That isn't the only thing "wrong" with the system tho. Our "system" is far more expensive than in any other industrialized country per patient. It will only get worse. There will be more and more of those wonderful capitalist corporations starting to refuse to provide coverage to employees. It's not just a matter of Public Health, it's also a matter of maintaing competitiveness. The costs of health care are just going to stop being subsidized by corporations. That's already beginning to happen.
All of this is of course JMO, and I'm glad I am able to express it.
Have a lovely day.
:hatparty:
|

Nov 14, 2006, 04:48 PM
|
|
|
Re: If money talks, why no universal healthcare?
|
|
Originally Posted by cabkrun
You are already paying exhorbatant taxes for things other countires get that we don't have. People are mistaken if they believe we pay fewer taxes than Europe. We don't. And I'm sorry, we don't "get" a lot for our taxes. Our infrastructure is crumbling, we have no way around relying on foreign oil, no health coverage, etc. etc. They have a transport/rail system that makes this country look like a third world country. They have health coverage for citizens, imperfect as it might be. They have successful programs that keep troubled teens off the street in Germany, and provides education and training to ensure they become functioning adults. Their streets are clean and well maintained. You can't walk through San Francisco, which should be one of the most beautiful cities in the world, w/o stepping on a homeless person or their "droppings"....or various other piles of trash. Some of it is a difference in culture, some of it is tax dollars making sure things are kept up. I'm not saying problems are absent in Europe, but I see it on a smaller scale. We all have problems.
You don't think someone isn't controlling what doctor you see in our current "system"? You must either be paying for it yourself, or have really expensive insurance.
I agree that reform needs to be in place regarding lawsuits. That isn't the only thing "wrong" with the system tho. Our "system" is far more expensive than in any other industrialized country per patient. It will only get worse. There will be more and more of those wonderful capitalist corporations starting to refuse to provide coverage to employees. It's not just a matter of Public Health, it's also a matter of maintaing competitiveness. The costs of health care are just going to stop being subsidized by corporations. That's already beginning to happen.
All of this is of course JMO, and I'm glad I am able to express it.
Have a lovely day.
:hatparty:
You show me a country that gets more benefits, has a stronger military, a better school system, a better university system, a free choice economy, free choice employment, free choice travel, free choice medical, and pay LESS taxes for it, and enjoys the level of peace and freedom, and quality of living that we have here. (and that is COLLECTIVELY)...and I'll put in for a VISA to move there tomorrow.
I could go industrialized country by industrialized country and name MAJOR things that you couldn't pay me to look over if I went there. I'm not going to go over that list here b/c we have members from other countries and I think that would be offensive to them.
I love visiting other countries, they are beautiful travel destinations, but as far as living, there is no way I would live anywhere but here.
Per capita, we are a ridiculously wealthy nation.
|

Nov 14, 2006, 04:50 PM
|
|
|
Re: If money talks, why no universal healthcare?
|
|
Americans already pay taxes for health care: We wind up picking up the cost of care for workers who don't get insurance through their jobs. Some uninsured workers and their families wind up on Medicaid; if they're not on Medicaid, they're likely to wind up in the emergency room, which taxpayers subsidize. And the number of uninsured is growing.
America already has a successful single-payer insurance system, only not everyone is eligible for it. It's Medicare. And for folks who want the government to stay out of their lives, that's fine -- if you don't want to participate in Medicare, you don't have to. But at least it's there for those who might otherwise have no alternative.
Princeton economist Paul Krugman estimates that the savings from a single-payer system would probably exceed $200 billion a year, far more than the cost of covering all of those now uninsured.
|

Nov 14, 2006, 04:54 PM
|
|
|
Re: If money talks, why no universal healthcare?
|
|
Originally Posted by BSNtobe2009
You show me a country that gets more benefits, has a stronger military, a better school system, a better university system, a free choice economy, free choice employment, free choice travel, free choice medical, and pay LESS taxes for it, and enjoys the level of peace and freedom, and quality of living that we have here. (and that is COLLECTIVELY)...and I'll put in for a VISA to move there tomorrow.
I could go industrialized country by industrialized country and name MAJOR things that you couldn't pay me to look over if I went there. I'm not going to go over that list here b/c we have members from other countries and I think that would be offensive to them.
I love visiting other countries, they are beautiful travel destinations, but as far as living, there is no way I would live anywhere but here.
Per capita, we are a ridiculously wealthy nation.
Everyone is entitled to believe what they want. I won't open my mouth on this any longer as it's not what the debate is really about and it's gotten off track. And I gotta study  . (I'm not a nursing student, but I like to keep up with the issues since we will all be part of a team at some point).
Thank you for your thoughts. Have a fabulous day.
|
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|