[HM2Viking]

"No organic foods, no fresh vegetables, we were looking for the cheapest of everything," McGovern said in an interview with The Washington Post at a Washington supermarket. "We got spaghetti and hamburger meat that was high in fat—the fattiest meat on the shelf. I have high cholesterol and always try to get the leanest, but it's expensive. It's almost impossible to make healthy choices on a food stamp diet."
...
Even for those people who are not seeing eroding benefits over time, the reality is “there are health consequences” to living on such a limited budget for more than a few days. People on food stamps are often forced to choose foods with higher fat, breads that are not whole grain and processed foods with unhealthy levels of sodium and sugar—a dangerous combination for people prone to diabetes, heart disease or other diet-related health problems. “Living (on $21 a week) for a week is different from living on it for six months,” Weill said.
...
That is why more people should demand to know why—in a year in which we are projected to give the wealthiest 1 percent of the nation some $56.5 billion in tax breaks, just to cite one example of the national priorities set by President Bush—we can’t do better than an average of $21 a week to ensure that our fellow Americans can have three decent meals a day.

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/200...1_question.php

[Suesquatch]

Yeah, there's a shock. Fruits and vegetables are expensive.

I always wonder how people with children can afford to feed them.

[Cymy]

Originally Posted by Suesquatch

Yeah, there's a shock. Fruits and vegetables are expensive.

I always wonder how people with children can afford to feed them.

In my house fruit is a special treat, vegetables are from a can or frozen. If I go out and buy $25 worth of fruit my kids eat it all in two days and I'm lucky if I can get a single banana or apple!

[MeghanRN]

I may stir something up, however..

I am under the impression that food stamps are supposed to be a suppliment, not the means for a persons entire food for the week.

With that being the case, the food stamps would buy most needed items for the week, with the receiver supplimenting their own money for the rest of the food.

But yes, fruits and veggies are expensive. Organic is not necessary for those on a tight budget (IMO).

[pickledpepperRN]

A family pays for food stamps according to income. The income must be at or below the poverty level.
The amount is $80.00 a month per person.
http://www.fns.usda.gov/fsp/faqs.htm

I think it would be a good idea for items like sodas and chips to be disallowed. You can't buy a bar of soap with food stamps (now a debit card). Why should you be able to buy junk?

Still it takes a brilliant nutritionist to provide healthy meals for the amount food stamps provises.
I know a nursing assistant who supports her mother, daughter, and grand child. She pays $170.00 for $240.00 in food stamps. It is a big help to her.

[VivaLasViejas]

I really hate to blow a hole in the myth that you can't eat decently on food stamps, but having been a recipient myself in the past, I know it's actually quite possible.............IF you know how and where to shop.

As someone already said, food stamps were never meant to be the only means of feeding a family, but a supplement to whatever income is available for food. Yes, fresh fruits and veggies are expensive, but seeds to grow them are not (and yes, food stamps can be used to buy seeds). Frozen and canned veggies and fruits are acceptable substitutes for fresh, and far better for you than candy.

Soda pop and potato chips are expensive too.......so you either buy the store brands, or don't buy them at all. Unsweetened Koolaid packets, on the other hand, are about 30 cents apiece, and when you put your own sugar or Splenda in, it makes an inexpensive treat for the kids.

You also have to shop around for the best buys in meats and other protein foods. Chicken can be had for sometimes as low as 59 cents a pound; turkey is also often less than a dollar a pound, and of course beans are a wonderful source of lean protein which cost very little and are incredibly versatile.

You also don't buy packaged bakery goods, for obvious reasons; if you've got to have cookies and cake, you make your own. You also stay away from the bright, sugary cereals and buy oatmeal and farina, or the big bags of rice crispies and puffed rice.

No, it's not haute cuisine, but it's do-able on a tight budget AND you won't starve to death. Believe me, I've been there and done that; you just have to be creative and flexible, and you have to be willing to cook---convenience just isn't possible on a food-stamp budget, sorry!

[ingelein]

Originally Posted by MeghanRN

I may stir something up, however..

I am under the impression that food stamps are supposed to be a suppliment, not the means for a persons entire food for the week.

With that being the case, the food stamps would buy most needed items for the week, with the receiver supplimenting their own money for the rest of the food.

But yes, fruits and veggies are expensive. Organic is not necessary for those on a tight budget (IMO).

Even non organic produce is expensive.

[southernatheart]

My hat is SOOOOO off to you!!

[HM2Viking]

I think the larger issue is that we have billions to spend on tax breaks for the most affluent in our society while 25% of our children are growing up in poverty......

[Jolie]

Originally Posted by HM2Viking

I think the larger issue is that we have billions to spend on tax breaks for the most affluent in our society while 25% of our children are growing up in poverty......

We don't spend money on tax breaks! The federal government has no money of its own to spend. It collects money from US taxpayers and re-allocates those funds to pay for programs, including food stamps.

Tax cuts allow individuals to keep more of the money they earn, and have been proven time and time again to actually increase revenues to the federal government, because individuals are capable of spending and investing their OWN money more wisely than the federal government. It is out of control federal spending that damages our economy, not tax cuts.

Entitlement programs have done precious little to reverse poverty. Trillions of dollars have been spent since the advent of the "Great Society" social programs without any decrease in the percentage of American families living in poverty. Pouring more money into a failing system will not fix it.