#1 Nursing Community for Nurses: 323,262 Members

Log in   Sign up   Why join?   | Layout: Color: gold style blue style rose style
Nursing Community for Nurses
Home Forums Articles Specialty Students Region Career Resources

Advanced Search

primary diagnosis and co-morbidity



Currently Online
Members: 259
Guests: 1,757
2,016

Newsletter

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the Nurse-zine Newsletter.

Enter email address:

Job Spotlight
Private Duty Nurse
Burnsville, Minnesota
Forum Spotlight
Infusion Nursing Forum

Nursing Degrees

Nursing Articles

Today We Lay to Rest...
Oscar The Octopus
The Male DR Nurse
Nursing Student Days
Tommy
New Supervisory Why?
What's That Smell?
Restorative Dining
Baby Who?
Posterior View
Submit An Article

Nursing Jobs

Job Seeker: Employer:

Scrubs & Gear

How-To allnurses

allnurses videos

Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses

The largest most active online nursing community. Join 323,262 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.

Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Jun 23, 2007, 02:39 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
primary diagnosis and co-morbidity

I was taught that documentation should be toward the primary diagnois and not the co-morbidities. All charting should be negative. For example, if the pt has Alzheimer's then I should not be documenting about the glucose level and the heart murmer.

I changed jobs a couple of weeks ago and the nurse working with me in orientation listed all the co-morbidities (and discussed in the narrative) for each patient on the nurse note. I asked her why and she just said "because we are supposed to". I thought that sounded like a home health answer -- not hospice.

I'd appreciate any input. Thanks!

Sharon

Top
  #2  
Old Jun 23, 2007, 03:38 PM
earle58's Avatar
Registered Nut
Join Date: Apr 2000
Re: primary diagnosis and co-morbidity

hi sharon,

don't you use a form that allows you to address all of the body systems?
i usually address all symptoms that interfere with a pt's distress levels.
the doctors billing for services are coded with the various dxs they are dealing with.

i'm not sure if everyone does it the same...

leslie

Top
  #3  
Old Jun 23, 2007, 07:58 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Re: primary diagnosis and co-morbidity

Originally Posted by Hospice Nurse LPN View Post
I was taught that documentation should be toward the primary diagnois and not the co-morbidities. All charting should be negative. For example, if the pt has Alzheimer's then I should not be documenting about the glucose level and the heart murmer.

I changed jobs a couple of weeks ago and the nurse working with me in orientation listed all the co-morbidities (and discussed in the narrative) for each patient on the nurse note. I asked her why and she just said "because we are supposed to". I thought that sounded like a home health answer -- not hospice.

I'd appreciate any input. Thanks!

Sharon
Sharon
I have been a hospice nurse for 15 years and am now a hospice educator. When I make a visit, I make sure to document all perteinet findings. I also documernt any decline in the pateint. Documentation needs to show some sort of decline if applicable, this will help when you need to recertify the patient. I document mainly on the primary diagnosis but if the co-morbitites are influecning deline than I document on that also. An example of documentation would be the patients vital signs, document delcine for example the patient is depdendent in 3 out of 6 adl's then if the pateint delcines and now needs assistance with say 5 out of 6 adl's it will be easiler to recongize the decline. I hope this helps

Top
  #4  
Old Jun 23, 2007, 08:26 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Re: primary diagnosis and co-morbidity

Thank you for your replies. I'm guessing my question wasn't really too clear. Kokobean's answer sounds alot like the way I chart. Of course, I'm checking vitals and listening to lungs, abd no matter the diagnosis. The way it was explained to me was that if I was charting on everything, then hospice would be responsible. For instance, the Lung CA pt who is still getting dialysis....I wouldn't document on the renal function or dialysis.

Top
  #5  
Old Jun 24, 2007, 08:25 AM
aimeee's Avatar
median moderator
Join Date: May 1999
Re: primary diagnosis and co-morbidity

Originally Posted by Hospice Nurse LPN View Post
The way it was explained to me was that if I was charting on everything, then hospice would be responsible. For instance, the Lung CA pt who is still getting dialysis....I wouldn't document on the renal function or dialysis.
When a patient is under hospice care then Hospice is the care manager
which means we retain ultimate responsibility for the coordination of the total care plan. Therefore, nothing is truly outside our realm. You continue to be responsible for making sure that the patient's needs are met and symptoms are controlled regardless of whoever else is involved. Charting by exception is the most expedient but the only way to show that everything is being addressed is to at least mention each area and state that no changes are observed, or current care plan effective, or some such thing. We are whole beings and all the co-morbidities affect the function of the other systems as well.

Top
  #6  
Old Jun 24, 2007, 08:51 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Re: primary diagnosis and co-morbidity

Originally Posted by aimeee View Post
When a patient is under hospice care then Hospice is the care manager
which means we retain ultimate responsibility for the coordination of the total care plan. Therefore, nothing is truly outside our realm. You continue to be responsible for making sure that the patient's needs are met and symptoms are controlled regardless of whoever else is involved. Charting by exception is the most expedient but the only way to show that everything is being addressed is to at least mention each area and state that no changes are observed, or current care plan effective, or some such thing. We are whole beings and all the co-morbidities affect the function of the other systems as well.
I totally agree with Aimeee. Yes, you are supposed to be documenting on decline in status but documenting on other problems does not mean that your hospice is responsible for paying for them. For instance - you could report that your patient that has lung CA had dialysis treatment yesterday and tolerated poorly/well. We are supposed to be taking care of the whole person - not just their diagnosis. Another example is a patient that I had with lung cancer who also had a long hx of HTN and heart disease. Her HTN got out of control while she was on service and I called her cardiac doctor and received orders to increase her BP meds. The last thing she needed was to have a stroke!

Top
  #7  
Old Jun 26, 2007, 09:43 PM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Re: primary diagnosis and co-morbidity

6-26-2007
The Hospice RN Case Mgr. is responsible for the whole patient and seeing to all areas of the patient. I, as a Case Manager, assess the whole patient and would expect anyone who seen any of my patients to report and document all pertinent findings outside the norm to me, so that I can ensure the proper treatment to manage my patient's symptoms and keep him/her comfortable, regardless of the Diagnosis we have admitted him/her for. If it is a symptom that should be managed by another MD, it is my job to ensure that the symptom is appropriately treated.

Ana

Top
Sponsored Links
 
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.



Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



New To Site?
Need Help?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 AM.

primary diagnosis and co-morbidity

Copyright © 1996-2008, allnurses.com. All rights reserved.  allnurses.com, Inc. Advertising Information