Originally Posted by Tanzanite
My NAI ancestory was back in the 1600's. They were the Micmac tribe near Novia Scotia/Port Royal. The French men married Indian wives,(no french women around, I presume) so my great grandma to the 9th or 10th power named "Radegonde", was my first NAI ancestor. I believe several Micmac's migrated to to ports in the US (especially Maine & Louisiana) after the great french deportation. I have no idea what percentage that would make me.
Hello Tanzanite,
My identification is the opposite: I consider that my Anishinaabe ancestry goes back until time immemorial yet that my European ancestry came in around the 1500's or so, (that is when the French Canadian joined the mix for me).
Glad to be a descendant of the spontaneously created people, fish clan.
Honor the TREATIES.
Gen
p.s. expressing no phenotypical-stereotypical "mythologizing the other" traits either.
p.p.s. edited to add, (darn I do have some stereotypical traits but, an expressed allele is just that, it is not a "culture" but an allele, however I do not believe that "validation" is required, nor do I believe in the arbitrary CDIB cards either and am glad to know that some Nations choose to reject that as a requirement for registery). Besides the CDIB is set to do to Native "blood quantum" the same as the DAwes Act did to Native land bases, which is to make them invalid and to eliminate any Fiduciary responsibility...