Originally Posted by MKZ
If one were to read the ATI closely enough , one can find ambiguous information ...
Sometimes I could find verbatim with a textbook in front of me, that said something completely opposite on the ATI practice test.
That's been an ongoing problem with our nursing program from the beginning. Unfortunately, there just isn't much consistency in nursing academia no matter what book you're looking at.
We'd always get test questions that never were mentioned in the book or, in any of the material we were given or, was totally contradicted in the material we were given. Finally, I figured out that I also needed study the NCLEX guides and do a ton of practice questions so I could figure out how to game the test, and that ended up helping me a lot.
In a weird way ... it also probably did prepare me for the ATI because, by then, I used to getting test questions that were totally out of left field.
And you're right ... the rationales in the ATI practice questions didn't always make a lot of sense and they were a lot different than anything we'd had before but, if you go through Saunders, Kaplan, etc. you'll see the same thing. None of NCLEX guides are consistent either.
So, what I focused on with ATI is: what are they driving at with these questions here? What is going on with this testing style? What are they looking for? In a lot of ways, you have to block out every other test you've ever taken and just focus on what these people are doing here.
It's really no different than trying to figure out what the teacher wants every time you start a new semester. Whatever you did on tests last semester doesn't matter anymore, you've got to adjust to the new teacher's testing style because it's always going to be different.