|
Job Spotlight
|
CRNA
Glendale, Arizona
|
Nursing Jobs
|
|
Job Seeker:
Employer:
|
How-To allnurses |
 |
|
Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
The largest most active online nursing community. Join 291,056 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.
|
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.

Apr 02, 2008, 09:17 PM
|
|
|
Question for the experienced ER RNs
|
|
I was suppose to graduate from an ADN program last May, but didn't pass by 4 points. At the time, I had a job lined up in two different ER's, and had to turn them both down. In the last year, I got my LPN license and have been working on the cardiac unit at my hospital (where I was a float PCP/CNA prior). I enjoy the floor, the type of pts, my coworkers, my unit manager and everything for the most part.
Now I am ready to graduate (AND PASS) this May with my ADN. I am doing much better in school this year. Again, I have an offer to work in the ER and of course stay on my cardiac floor.
A part of me says to stay on the cardiac floor, get more experience, and later move to the ER. But I LOVE the ER, which I have since I floated in there as a cna/tech. I am up on arms on which way to go. I ask local RNs, and some say go to the ER, others say get the experience on the floor. The only con I can think of for the cardiac floor, is that sometimes they are short nurses, which each nurse takes 15 pts. Normally, it's 10 pts, and they are trying to get to primary care with 5-6 pts for each RN. I don't really want 10 pts much less 15, ya know!
Cons for the ER? Not sure, I really enjoy it all, puke, poop, crazies, drunks and all!
Any advice from my wiser peers?
|

Apr 02, 2008, 09:40 PM
|
|
|
Re: Question for the experienced ER RNs
|
|
If you want the ER, go to the ER. The floor experience you've had is invaluable but it's always the risks and opportunities you don't take that drag on you later.
What if you turn down ER and later have trouble getting in? Or then they want eperienced people first.
If you're in ER, it's usually easier to go back to the floor and you'll know more of what to expect, plus you'll have the perspective of both positions.
|

Apr 02, 2008, 10:25 PM
|
|
|
Re: Question for the experienced ER RNs
|
|
I agree about going to the ER if that is what you want to do.... I am planning on going to the ER also (as soon as a spot comes open, I had to wait because I hadn't finished a class yet)but I love the variety and the change every hour just about and then the people they never cease to amaze me.
|

Apr 03, 2008, 01:14 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
Re: Question for the experienced ER RNs
|
|
I would say go to the ER if they are going to train you with a preceptor (treat you as a new grad). Since this was your original goal, you might find yourself resenting things on the floor if you stay just because of the familiarity there. If you love puke, poop and drunks, there is no better place for you than the ER
Personally, I think the best thing about it is the ability to leave at the end of the shift (most of the time) and not have to stay to catch up on paperwork. It is about the only place I have seen where 24/7 care really is understood; and, you can just hand off your unfinished work to the nurse that relieves you because you picked up the previous nurse's infinished work.
|

Apr 03, 2008, 08:38 AM
|
|
|
Re: Question for the experienced ER RNs
|
|
Thanks all! One of the things that makes me want to stay is the pressure from my friends/coworkers on the floor. But you know what they say about peer pressure! I think I will persue that ER spot! And yes, I'll be with a preceptor for 3-4 months.
|

Apr 04, 2008, 09:11 AM
|
|
|
Re: Question for the experienced ER RNs
|
|
|

Apr 04, 2008, 11:41 AM
|
|
|
Re: Question for the experienced ER RNs
|
|
Good luck, you will love the ER. I transferred there after doing ICU for 14 yrs and like the mix of both. As long as you have a good sense of humour and are a little crazy you will love the ER!
|

Apr 08, 2008, 06:02 PM
|
|
|
Re: Question for the experienced ER RNs
|
|
If you really want the ER then go there. You don't want to waste time hating the Med/Surg floor and be miserable while you wait to transfer.
However, in MY OPINION, I don't think new grads should start in the ER. I believe that the ER is not the place to teach new grads how to be a nurse. It's just too busy! As an ER nurse you need to be able to look at a patient and instantly have an idea of what's really wrong and the severity. For example, an experience nurse knows (in general) what a true heart attack patient looks like and how treat. I think that being in the ER is just too overwhelming for a new grad. In my ER we hire new grads but by experience I noticed that very few last. They usually transfer to the tele floors because "this is just too much". In fact, we hired four new grads and only 1 stayed. The turnover for new grads in the ER is very high so be prepared....
|

Apr 08, 2008, 11:11 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
Re: Question for the experienced ER RNs
|
|
Originally Posted by TraumaRN11
If you really want the ER then go there. You don't want to waste time hating the Med/Surg floor and be miserable while you wait to transfer.
However, in MY OPINION, I don't think new grads should start in the ER. I believe that the ER is not the place to teach new grads how to be a nurse. It's just too busy! As an ER nurse you need to be able to look at a patient and instantly have an idea of what's really wrong and the severity. For example, an experience nurse knows (in general) what a true heart attack patient looks like and how treat. I think that being in the ER is just too overwhelming for a new grad. In my ER we hire new grads but by experience I noticed that very few last. They usually transfer to the tele floors because "this is just too much". In fact, we hired four new grads and only 1 stayed. The turnover for new grads in the ER is very high so be prepared....
I disagree. A busy tele unit can be just as bad if not worse. In many ways the ER is actually a better place IMHO. MAR's, chart checks, etc. I dump my patient off on the tele foor and say "thak God I don't worke here" to myself on most days. It is simply a matter of what area of nursing works for you. For example, I currently work as a flight RN. It would be a joke watching me take on 9 tele patients. In spite of all of my ER, transport, and flight experience, it would be an absolute joke. Again, this is only my opinion.
|

Apr 09, 2008, 01:54 PM
|
|
|
Re: Question for the experienced ER RNs
|
|
Originally Posted by TraumaRN11
If you really want the ER then go there. You don't want to waste time hating the Med/Surg floor and be miserable while you wait to transfer.
However, in MY OPINION, I don't think new grads should start in the ER. I believe that the ER is not the place to teach new grads how to be a nurse. It's just too busy! As an ER nurse you need to be able to look at a patient and instantly have an idea of what's really wrong and the severity. For example, an experience nurse knows (in general) what a true heart attack patient looks like and how treat. I think that being in the ER is just too overwhelming for a new grad. In my ER we hire new grads but by experience I noticed that very few last. They usually transfer to the tele floors because "this is just too much". In fact, we hired four new grads and only 1 stayed. The turnover for new grads in the ER is very high so be prepared....
I also disagree about new grads in the ER. Personally i prefer to work with ER nurses who have ICU and M/S experience because they are able to handle a busy load (Med Surg) and handle a critical unstable patient (ICU).
my home ED has now been hiring new Grads for 6 years. it is a Huuuge 60 bed level one trauma center. our new grads have all stayed except for 2 who went to traveling. I think if there is such high turnover in your new grad population, you might want to look at your orientation.
For the original poster (OP)
As far as having to take a lot of patients, this will happen in the ER too. If ther eis a nasty trauma or some guy needing to go to the cath lab, that nurse is going to be completely tied up, meaning that suddenly their 5-6 other patients are going to be someone elses responsibility, which you will pretty much have to assume without getting some sort of detailed report. So I wouldnt count on not having a lot of patient load in the ER, the acuity of those inherited patients can also be pretty high.
Still, I recommend the ER if its what you want to do. if you hate it, you know you will have a place on the tele floor....
The following member says Thank You:
|
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|