Originally Posted by psalm_55
Fotografe wrote: it's called INFORMED CONSENT -- which is required as the result of what the NAZIs did in WWII. This international law was borne of the Nuremburg trials.
administeriing even a placebo -- which is harmless in every way -- requires informed consent.
violating informed consent constitutes criminal negligence. it's a slam dunk! and a fast track to court.
I'm sorry, but this is ridiculous. It is up to the patient to inform the staff if they have a specific dietary concern. We are not expected to know the restrictions and intricacies of every religion out there. We are expected to make every effort to respect these things if we are informed of them.
As a Jewish person, it is up to me to figure out what I want to ingest. There are many different degrees of observance in many religions, so assuming that I won't eat pork because I'm Jewish is just that, assuming. You don't know what my rabbi and I have discussed about medication. You don't know what decisions I may have already made. You assume I'm an ignorant Jewish person that should be told there's pork in a medication? You give me no credit? C'mon.
Informed consent is not for medication administration. Patients agree to a General Treatment Consent for this purpose and it is their job as a consumer to ask questions. I will tell them, this xyz medication was prescribed by your MD for xyz condition. Do you have any questions about the medication? and that's it.
On admission I don't ask what foods you eat. If you're vegan, tell me if you really care. If you don't want blood products, tell me if you really care. Otherwise, I can't read your mind nor would I expect anyone to read my mind. If I'm a patient and something is important to me, like no mercury in a vaccine, I speak out, I ask for what I need, and I make every effort possible to fulfill my personal beliefs. But, it is up to me.
The following member says Thank You: