[jaimealmostRN]

Hey everyone, I heard this today from a very expirenced RN at my new job. Where I previously worked the ER RN's had 4-5 patients and maybe (maybe) in a real pinch they'd have 6 pts. Where you work is it common to have 8 or more pts???? Both hospitals are located in the same town and are both very urban. I understand that the ER is extremely unpredicatable, but 8??? That seems like way too many...and I don't think it's a management thing either (ie. not being given enough staff for nights, etc) b/c this hosptial has much much much better management, NMs,VPs (and is very nurse-centric) than the one with the 4-5:1 ratio. I really wanted to stay on that this new job, but I'm not sure if I could ever handle 8 ER pts, even if they were minor care. Opinions please??????????????

[traumaRUs]

I think 8 pts is quite a few! However, I would definitely talk to some nurses that work there.

[SWFlorida]

It would depend on their acuity level. In most ER's the traffic level can be very unpredictable. Its not like you can pull in extra staff out of thin air. Sure you can call in the on-call staff, however even then things can be really busy. There are times where you may have a very heavy load.

In our ER a nurse may handle 4 pts but their levels may be very acute. Other nurses will help however in general you bear the responsiblity. I have had 3 cardiacs and a truama all at one time. They will all be on monitors and one may be getting TPA and one may be being tubed. You better believe that if i am that busy the nurses in the minor care area of the ER may have 8 or more pts. You just do the best you can.

In ER's they don't make appoinments, it would be convenient if they did.

[newfloridaRN]

We only have 3-4 patients at most in our ER, but if we have an ICU or an acute patient, the charge nurse will help out till we get that patient to the floor.

[jaimealmostRN]

Originally Posted by SWFlorida

In our ER a nurse may handle 4 pts but their levels may be very acute. Other nurses will help however in general you bear the responsiblity. I have had 3 cardiacs and a truama all at one time. They will all be on monitors and one may be getting TPA and one may be being tubed. You better believe that if i am that busy the nurses in the minor care area of the ER may have 8 or more pts. You just do the best you can.

OK, this makes a little more sense. So in a minor care/observation area one could have 8+ pts, but in the more acute sections 4ish? What is the most you have had in that area (acute)? Actually if I thought about it before I freaked out, I would have realized that there are only 9 beds in the more critical adult section of the ER, so I don't think one RN would be assigned to all those. oops.

[nursie nurse]

i read this topic with wonderment and in amazement because a 8:1 ratio in my ER would be a dream! most nights we can have 10-12 pts each (a mixture of acute and non-acute pts) in rooms and the hallway because our urgent care center closes at 8pm. ...so all the minor stuff gets grouped with the acute pts.....it sucks but that's the reality of a non-unionized hospital too.....there really should be fair distribution of the pts based on acuity though.....

[SWFlorida]

The bad part about the whole situation is that most of the low acuity pts really dont need to be in an Emergency Room. They should have gone to see their primary care dr or gone to a clinic. But it is more convenient for them to visit their "doc in a box" the local ER.

If pts go to their primary care dr they are expected to pay upfront or at least their co-pay. This is not required for an ER visit. Another abuse of the system.

"Mrs Jones, I see on your chart that you have had back pain for 12 days. Now what made you decide to visit the ER trauma center at Midnight on a Friday night?"

[MrsWampthang]

Originally Posted by SWFlorida

"Mrs Jones, I see on your chart that you have had back pain for 12 days. Now what made you decide to visit the ER trauma center at Midnight on a Friday night?"

Oh but with all the hoopla over "customer satisfaction" we're not supposed to ask that! We are told that it doesn't matter why they are in our ER, we treat them! Got to keep those too stupid to live "customers" happy you know!

Pam

[rjflyn]

Makes me wonder what California's ratio law has them seeing and taking care of.

Where I work its typically 4 per nurse at the most. Personally it should be based on acuity. If one has a level 1 pt it should be one on one, no more than 2 pts if they are level 2 and then it gets cloudy from there because of each nurses ablility and skill. The bad thing is our ER is typically full between 11A and 3A with the level one and two pts and the 3-5's sit and wait, unless our minor care is open then some of those go there- but with the histories these pts have and the workups they get, the cant go there either. Plus we admit 25-30% of the pts we see.
Rj

[stretch thin]

Acquity? Does the management really look at that? I know at my hospital, it's a body with a degree. They don't care how many they pile on one nurse. I have been argueing with management regarding a aquity scale vs the nurses we have. I know often times we hold ICU pts because the ICU nurse can't have three-somes, but yet we have 4-5-6 pts and sometimes even 7. I know personally, being the charge nurse/transfer coordinator at night, it's often difficult to handle all of that plus take a team. I'm not one of those charge nurses that sit on their butts. I feel so bad because I don't think I give good care and that's why I went into this position. IE. Stretchthin!