[abooker]

My potential BSN program requires "nursing statistics" or students can take a statistics course offered by the sociology department.

Is/was statistics a part of your curriculum? If so, is/was the statistics instructor from a department other than mathematics?

Any opinions/observations about statistics in general?

[Spidey's mom]

Yes, statistics is a pre-req for the RN-BSN program I will be starting in January.

I am in stats now. My instructor's background is in psychology. He is great - available on his cell phone from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. Gives us all the help we could possibly need and is a funny and very good teacher.

Stats is hard for me - even so. It seems like "math" would be black and white but this is not.

I will NEVER look at a statistic in the newspaper again the same. Stats can be skewed in so many different directions - the direction the researcher wants.

steph

[luvschoolnursing]

I had to take statistics for my BSN. Took it from a math instructor at the local community college. (my BSN program was great about accepting as many credits as it was able from the CC) Nearly killed me. Only class that brought me to tears. Come to think of it nearly killed my family, too. Never use it. Not sure why it was required.

[llg]

Statistics is required in almost all BSN programs. Understanding basic stats allows the professional nurse to understand the nursing literature -- particularly the research reports. Without an understanding of statistics and the priniciples of research, nurses are not able to correctly interpret and evaluate the quality what they read or hear.

[Spidey's mom]

Originally Posted by llg

Statistics is required in almost all BSN programs. Understanding basic stats allows the professional nurse to understand the nursing literature -- particularly the research reports. Without an understanding of statistics and the priniciples of research, nurses are not able to correctly interpret and evaluate the quality what they read or hear.

I agree with that.

I just wouldn't want to be a researcher and use statistics.

steph

[abooker]

I'm an "independent scholar" according to the NAS. Researchers are supposed to get in touch with their ontological and epistemological realities. Blargh. I hope stats hasn't turned into one of those touchy-feely classes. Math. Give me math.

The things I studied back in the 1980's, scientific method, analysis, applications - I'm not observing much of that in the literature now that we're approaching 2008. I'm seeing this: "Data do not provide a window on reality. Rather the 'discovered' reality arises from the interactive process and its temporal, cultural, and structural contexts"

Originally Posted by stevielynn

I will NEVER look at a statistic in the newspaper again the same. Stats can be skewed in so many different directions - the direction the researcher wants. steph

I'm just a little concerned about what I'll be encountering if I persue the BSN, and take "nursing statistics". I can't yell "skewed data" if data is merely someone's opinion. I think constructed reality = opinion?

Reference: Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), Article 3. Retrieved 11/27/07 from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backiss.../pdf/mills.pdf

[llg]

Originally Posted by abooker

I'm just a little concerned about what I'll be encountering if I persue the BSN, and take "nursing statistics". I can't yell "skewed data" if data is merely someone's opinion. I think constructed reality = opinion?
[/url]

Most stats classes focus on the stats themselves ... what they mean ... how they are used in research ... etc. The people who teach stats are rarely, if ever, the philosophical or "touch-feely" types.

[Spidey's mom]

Originally Posted by llg

Most stats classes focus on the stats themselves ... what they mean ... how they are used in research ... etc. The people who teach stats are rarely, if ever, the philosophical or "touch-feely" types.

My teacher is very warm and compassionate . . however, "touchy-feely" in the way you mean it . . no.

And this is just a generic statistics class . . not specifically for nurses.

There are 5 of us in this class, all nurses. His other class, that just finished had 28 (I think), not all nurses.

It isn't concrete however . . . sometimes I'll read a paragraph that sounds a lot like your quote (a booker): "Data do not provide a window on reality. Rather the 'discovered' reality arises from the interactive process and its temporal, cultural, and structural contexts"

I'm left shaking my head . . . . Where's the math?

steph

[vickynurse]

Mark Twain said "There are lies, there are d**n lies, and there are statistics." It is important for nurses to know how stats can be massaged. It is also important to be able to evaluate the statistical methods when reading the professional literature.

[HeartsOpenWide]

Originally Posted by abooker

My potential BSN program requires "nursing statistics" or students can take a statistics course offered by the sociology department.

Is/was statistics a part of your curriculum? If so, is/was the statistics instructor from a department other than mathematics?

Any opinions/observations about statistics in general?

Stats was required for my BSN program too. I took it with anatomy and an GE art class. I SUCK at math but found it to be interesting. I worked my tail off for the B I got in the class. Most practical math you will ever use in my opinion (others on here seem to disagree). I took a basic Stats class so my teacher was a math teacher and really smart too. I would go to class early so I could as questions to understand stuff better. I hear that people that are good at math hate stats and people that are good at English (me) enjoy it compared to algebra and other math. It was the first math class that I did not need a tutor.