Originally Posted by llg
Most stats classes focus on the stats themselves ... what they mean ... how they are used in research ... etc. The people who teach stats are rarely, if ever, the philosophical or "touch-feely" types.
I’m confused.
If there is a significant difference between how stats is taught to nursing students and how stats is used by nursing researchers, then … isn’t that a problem?
Maybe I’m reading the wrong publications (I’m finding stuff on the Web – maybe worth what I’m paying for it)
My opinion is that philosophical types write the most useful qualitative research, and “touchy-feely” types write the least useful. I’m biased, because I know which majors score highest on the GRE. I regret using “touchy-feely” to mean education, sociology, psych types. Like HeartsOpenWide I’m good at English, and I turned out good at statistics, but that was 20 years ago. Thank you all for your reassurance.
Is there a “Nursing as a second language” course out there somewhere?
Reference:
http://ace.acadiau.ca/arts/phil/why_phil/scores.htm