I wouldn't want to be in a front loaded program, then go take my boards, and have to review EVERYTHING I learned a year ago. I would also hope that an integrated program would help SRNA's to be better anesthetists.
I am in the final stretch of a front-loaded program and I have a best friend who is attending an integrated program. I chose my school for location, not for format. In the end I believe that it all equals out. I think what is important is how you learn best. One of my concerns with an integrated program is was how could I give anesthesia when I would not even have pharmacology until the third semester, but still be responsible for giving drugs! My program has two semesters of classes before going into clinical but then we have at least one class with clinicals for the next three semesters (so in a way it is part of both formats). My classmates and I wondered if we would remember what we learned the first two semesters when clinical came around. We found that once we got started, things just came to us, that all the studying was there somewhere and we were able to bring it forth. I don't believe that one program format is necessarily better than the other when it comes to taking boards. Some integrated programs end classes after the first year, so they too must review for boards. Seriously, is there a program out there where you do not have to review for boards, integrated or front-loaded? As for developing "better" anesthetists, each program format does this well. By giving it your most, it is usually the individual that determines his/her own ability to give anesthesia and be the best CRNA that they can be.