#1 Nursing Resource: 8 Million pageviews per month

Log in   Sign up   Why join?   | Layout: Switch to narrow layout Color: gold style blue style rose style
Nursing Community for Nurses
Home Forums Articles Specialty Students Region Career Resources

Advanced Search Site Help Site Map

DNP required soon?



Currently Online
Members: 203
Guests: 1,188
1,391

Job Spotlight
ER & L&D RN
Houston, Texas
Administrator
Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
Forum Spotlight
Distance Learning for Nursing

Nursing Degrees

Nursing Articles

Funny Nursing Stories
Funny Nursing Stories
Funny Nursing Stories
Be Kind to Co-workers, Or Else
Fixodent or Forget it!
Me and Mr. Smith and Waffles
How quickly we forget.
It is my X-ray
Thanksgiving Humor
Halloween Humor
Submit An Article

Nursing Jobs

Job Seeker: Employer:

Scrubs & Gear

Newsletter

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the free allnurses.com Nurse-zine Newsletter.

Enter email address:


Read current:
Nursing Newsletter

How-To allnurses

allnurses videos

Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses

The largest most active online nursing community. Join 312,271 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.

Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #61  
Old Oct 09, 2007, 11:15 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Re: DNP required soon?

I agree. CRNA's hold advanced degrees that are academically and clinically challenging to attain. If the DNP or DNAP is offered to me after I get my MSN for CRNA, then I'll take it. I think that patients are bound to get educated to the fact that nurses' education can be advanced enough to be doctors of nursing. For the issue of misrepresentation, a nurse with a clinical doctorate should be called 'doctor' in the clinical setting. However, it should be followed by a short explanation, or longer one if the patient looks at you with a confused face. "Hello, I'm Dr. Jones, I will be your nurse anesthetist providing your anesthesia during your surgery." It's the same as saying "I'm Dr. Smith, I'm a dentist here to look at your tooth." I think the title automatically tells the patient that you didn't just get your associate degree RN and start working for an MD in the anesthesia dept. If I were a patient, I'd feel more comfortable with a doctorally prepared anesthesia provider, whether that provider were a nurse or an MD. It also enables us to convey to patients, albeit one at a time, that nursing isn't limited to the ADN at the bedside of a med-surg ward.

Top
  #62  
Old Oct 09, 2007, 05:32 PM
dfk
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Re: DNP required soon?

Originally Posted by drinkwd40 View Post
I agree. CRNA's hold advanced degrees that are academically and clinically challenging to attain. If the DNP or DNAP is offered to me after I get my MSN for CRNA, then I'll take it. I think that patients are bound to get educated to the fact that nurses' education can be advanced enough to be doctors of nursing. For the issue of misrepresentation, a nurse with a clinical doctorate should be called 'doctor' in the clinical setting. However, it should be followed by a short explanation, or longer one if the patient looks at you with a confused face. "Hello, I'm Dr. Jones, I will be your nurse anesthetist providing your anesthesia during your surgery." It's the same as saying "I'm Dr. Smith, I'm a dentist here to look at your tooth." I think the title automatically tells the patient that you didn't just get your associate degree RN and start working for an MD in the anesthesia dept. If I were a patient, I'd feel more comfortable with a doctorally prepared anesthesia provider, whether that provider were a nurse or an MD. It also enables us to convey to patients, albeit one at a time, that nursing isn't limited to the ADN at the bedside of a med-surg ward.
i'm sorry. i don't agree. i think this will only confuse patients further. many doctorally prepared nurses present themselves as "name", CRNA. adequate and not confusing (anymore than them thinking you are a doctor already just because you are part of anesthesia). there is lack of education and lack of knowing within the public about nurses in the advanced role, especially anesthesia. i just don't think the public is ready to be a bit more confused with the doctor thing.

Top
  #63  
Old Oct 10, 2007, 10:01 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Re: DNP required soon?

Originally Posted by dfk View Post
i'm sorry. i don't agree. i think this will only confuse patients further. many doctorally prepared nurses present themselves as "name", CRNA. adequate and not confusing (anymore than them thinking you are a doctor already just because you are part of anesthesia). there is lack of education and lack of knowing within the public about nurses in the advanced role, especially anesthesia. i just don't think the public is ready to be a bit more confused with the doctor thing.
Because we underestimate the public we serve with this missed opportunity to educate them, your contention is "just not tell them?" My goodness, how do you think they will understand the complexities of the anesthesia you're giving them (or the post-op instructions, or about the procedure they're having, or about their diabetes, etc. etc. etc.)? Do you just not tell them that?

Top
  #64  
Old Oct 10, 2007, 03:40 PM
dfk
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Re: DNP required soon?

Originally Posted by DIGNOUT View Post
Because we underestimate the public we serve with this missed opportunity to educate them, your contention is "just not tell them?" My goodness, how do you think they will understand the complexities of the anesthesia you're giving them (or the post-op instructions, or about the procedure they're having, or about their diabetes, etc. etc. etc.)? Do you just not tell them that?
i don't think that just before a procedure is the time to tell them/confuse them. i do agree that the public we serve should be educated, just not at that time.
and no, i don't go into the complexities of my anesthesia. they won't understand the "complexities" as you so put it, and just don't need to. the more you tell the more they forget and the more they worry. i've seen it, and have adapted to that. as for the basics? absolutely.

Top
  #65  
Old Oct 12, 2007, 04:38 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Re: DNP required soon?

Originally Posted by dfk View Post
i don't think that just before a procedure is the time to tell them/confuse them. i do agree that the public we serve should be educated, just not at that time.
and no, i don't go into the complexities of my anesthesia. they won't understand the "complexities" as you so put it, and just don't need to. the more you tell the more they forget and the more they worry. i've seen it, and have adapted to that. as for the basics? absolutely.
...Not to, but I'm gonna... Senator Semantics has informed me that 'complexities' is probably the wrong word choice. I agree. Sorry. When you explain the basics, and they become confused (as inevitably happens now and again), how do you compensate or adjust your teaching? Give up? Nope. People don't get stuff sometimes, but they can. The point is this: a missed opportunity to teach someone is a missed opportunity. Period. Without getting into the politics, education curricula, etc., one can simply identify themselves appropriately without bending or breaking the truth, or even without confusing the layest of laypeople. When you say "at that time," you are implying that you are talking to them the first time on the table or in a crunch. No, that's probably not an appropriate time to say Dr. CRNA. There are appropriate missed opportunities to bolster our quest to end the nurse = trade school/handmaiden mentality. Seen the article that nursing is the highest paid profession that does not require college education? I rest my case.

Top
  #66  
Old Oct 12, 2007, 05:58 PM
dfk
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Re: DNP required soon?

Originally Posted by DIGNOUT View Post
...Not to, but I'm gonna... Senator Semantics has informed me that 'complexities' is probably the wrong word choice. I agree. Sorry. When you explain the basics, and they become confused (as inevitably happens now and again), how do you compensate or adjust your teaching? Give up? Nope. People don't get stuff sometimes, but they can. The point is this: a missed opportunity to teach someone is a missed opportunity. Period. Without getting into the politics, education curricula, etc., one can simply identify themselves appropriately without bending or breaking the truth, or even without confusing the layest of laypeople. When you say "at that time," you are implying that you are talking to them the first time on the table or in a crunch. No, that's probably not an appropriate time to say Dr. CRNA. There are appropriate missed opportunities to bolster our quest to end the nurse = trade school/handmaiden mentality. Seen the article that nursing is the highest paid profession that does not require college education? I rest my case.
i don't disagree with your argument. i just don't agree with the issue at hand. my choice, as yours is yours.
so yea, the case is rested.
as for the article, i hope it's a rhetorical question.

Top
  #67  
Old Oct 12, 2007, 06:03 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Re: DNP required soon?

Originally Posted by DIGNOUT View Post
... Senator Semantics has informed me that 'complexities' is probably the wrong word choice. ........
Professor Hayakawa would be pleased to be remembered..........

d

Top
  #68  
Old Oct 12, 2007, 11:59 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Re: DNP required soon?

Originally Posted by dfk View Post
i don't disagree with your argument. i just don't agree with the issue at hand. my choice, as yours is yours.
so yea, the case is rested.
as for the article, i hope it's a rhetorical question.
No, it's not. This is what our public is learning about nursing as a profession. Not that I have an identity crisis, but we are not uneducated individuals.

The practice doctorate is coming. If one's against it, fine, don't get it. It will only be a requirement to ENTER the anesthesia advanced practice specialty come 2025. Whether or not one calls him-/herself Dr. Feelgood, that's his or her bag of potatoes. I'm all for it.

Top
  #69  
Old Oct 13, 2007, 12:01 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Re: DNP required soon?

Originally Posted by deepz View Post
Professor Hayakawa would be pleased to be remembered..........

d
I thought I was the only ex-english major out there.

Top
  #70  
Old Oct 13, 2007, 07:34 AM
NRSKarenRN's Avatar
Co-Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Re: DNP required soon?

AANA Supports CRNA Entry-Level PhD by 2025

Top
Sponsored Links
 
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.



Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



New To Site?
Need Help?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.

DNP required soon?

Copyright © 1996-2008, allnurses.com. All rights reserved.  allnurses.com, Inc. Advertising Information