Re: Can you fill me in on....
Canada has an excellent health care system where no one is turned away. I can't believe that an "inspector" went to someone's house, saw ashtrays and took away the home oxygen. That would never be condoned by any health region and I've never heard of health care inspectors either. Home care case managers might visit a home and make suggestions about the safe use of oxygen if ashtrays were present in the home, but wouldn't have the authority to take the oxygen away.
There are definite criteria for things like dialysis and organ transplants, medical criteria that have nothing to do with a specific person or their habits, per se. There are several types of dialysis and they are used under different circumstances. Peritoneal dialysis is something that can be done at home, but it requires an intact abdominal wall and abdominal organs, access to running water, a place to store a large quantity of supplies and scrupulous personal hygiene. It has been successfully done on some of the remotest reserves in Northern Manitoba for years. Continuous venovenous hemofiltration can only be done in a hospital, usually in ICU. It's the gentlest form of dialysis and is used for people who would not tolerate the huge fluid shifts of hemodialysis, or the electrolyte shifts that also occur. Hemodialysis is done in hospitals or free-standing dialysis clinics and as the population ages and the number of diabetics suffering renal failure increase, so does the demand for dialysis.
Organ transplants have their own set of criteria, both medical and ethical. There are certain absolute contraindications to transplantation that have little to do with lifestyle choices; the presence of malignancy is one. Immunosuppressant drugs act like Miracle Grow for cancer, so why go there? Just as not everyone is a candidate for the priesthood, not everyone is a candidate fro transplantation. Here in our hospital we've done heart transplants on children who have been turned away elsewhere due to the complexity of their illness; we've delivered an infant with a known lethal defect at 37 weeks because a heart was available. No one is turned away for inability to commit to long-term followup, compliance to the plan of care or the ability to pay... for the surgery, the hospitalization, the after care or the drugs.
Does that clear some things up for you?