#1 Nursing Resource: 806,000 unique visitors per month

Log in   Sign up   Why join?   | Layout: Switch to narrow layout Color: gold style blue style rose style
Nursing Community for Nurses
Home Forums Articles Specialty Students Region Career Resources

Advanced Search Site Help Site Map

Nursing Shortage?



Currently Online
Members: 326
Guests: 2,993
3,319

Job Spotlight
ER & L&D RN
Houston, Texas
Forum Spotlight
Distance Learning for Nursing

Nursing Degrees

Nursing Articles

It is my X-ray
Thanksgiving Humor
Halloween Humor
Night Nurse III: Slip-Slidin' Awaaaaaaay
Lights out
Stand at attention!!!
2 am admission
funny nursing stories
Night Nurse II: I Tawt I Taw A Puddy-Tat!
Orientation Day LPN to RN
Submit An Article

Nursing Jobs

Job Seeker: Employer:

Scrubs & Gear

Newsletter

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the free allnurses.com Nurse-zine Newsletter.

Enter email address:


Read current:
Nursing Newsletter

How-To allnurses

allnurses videos

Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses

The largest most active online nursing community. Join 311,071 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.

Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Feb 24, 2002, 08:29 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Nursing Shortage?

An article found in the recent archives of the Cheyenne paper. Comment made by the WNA states 18% of nurses are busy doing something other than nursing. Here is the article:

Shortage becoming critical

Joanne Bowlby
Wyoming Tribune-Eagle

Wyoming Tribune-Eagle
CHEYENNE – Long waits in emergency rooms and rushed doctor’s office visits are just some of the annoying effects for patients from the national nursing shortage.

But more critical problems are beginning to surface.

School secretaries are dispensing medications like Prozac and Ritalin when the nurse is not available.

Nursing home patients aren’t always getting the personalized care for which they pay.

Hospitals may be the hardest hit. A recent survey shows that a shortage of nurses in hospitals can strongly affect the chances of patients suffering adverse reactions like gastrointestinal bleeding and pneumonia. Researchers said staffing problems could be a factor in thousands of deaths annually.

Nurses say the shortage is becoming so severe that it threatens patient care.

"It increases the risk of something serious happening and increases the hospital’s liability," said Michelle, an emergency room nurse at United Medical Center-West. "As nurses, we don’t want to see anything happen, but it could."

ER nurses don’t use their last names for safety reasons.

"The nursing shortage is a big ball of problems," Michelle added. "When patient numbers increase, the number of nurses needs to increase, but I don’t think that’s happening."

Part of the problem is there aren’t many nurses out there.

But Wyoming Nurses Association President Toni Decklever said a bigger problem is the 18 percent of registered nurses who are not working in the field.

"Where are they?" she said. "Delivering packages or stocking shelves."

They’re in other jobs where the pay and work conditions are better, she said.

Patients suffer the consequences. Nurses from around Cheyenne say they are frustrated and can’t give the level of care they think patients deserve because there are more patients to see and fewer nurses to help with the workload.



How did it get this bad?

There are 77 million aging Baby Boomers who will need medical care in increasing numbers in the coming years.

With only 44 million people in Generation X, all industries are finding it difficult to find qualified workers. Nursing homes have been hit particularly hard.

Not only has the number of people enrolling in nursing schools dropped over the past decade, the number of people who need a nursing home has risen significantly.

"As less people are available to work, we are aging," said Kathy Sanford, director of nursing at Harrison Memorial Hospital in Bremerton, Wash. "It’s a double whammy.

"This is the smallest job pool since the 1960s. We are competing with others that are going to have shortages too."

Sanford said in Washington state, less than 9 percent of the nursing staff is under the age of 30, and more than half of the work force is scheduled to retire within the next 15 years.

Washington’s statistics mirror the nation, she said.



Industry issues addressed

Many students are opting for professions other than nursing, Sanford said, because "the work is really, really hard."

She said the industry as a whole needs to address the problem and change the image of nursing to attract students into the profession.

But she said changing the image isn’t enough.

"It’s no good if once they get in, it’s no fun," Sanford said.

Carol Polifroni, dean of the Connecticut School of Nursing, agrees. She said studies have shown people shape their ideas about careers as early as age 6.

The industry is suffering from treating its staff poorly, she said.

Long shifts produce exhausted mothers. Polifroni said she worries that the negative impact could have lasting effects.

"Mom’s a nurse now and comes home from work exhausted," she said. "The natural response is, ‘I don’t want to do that. I don’t want to work so hard for so little money.’ "



Some possible solutions

Both short-term and long-term solutions must be developed, she said. Among her suggestions:

Get as many certified nurses back into the work force as possible.

Get high school students interested in nursing.

Increase salaries.

But Polifroni said the most important change needed is to give greater respect and autonomy to the profession.

Excessive paperwork and mandatory overtime frustrates nurses and makes them feel less like caregivers and more like robots, she said.

Polifroni has asked the Connecticut Legislature to recognize the work nurses do and provide some incentives for nurses to work in the state.

Loan forgiveness, scholarships and low-interest mortgages for nurses are just a few of the measures she has proposed. A legislative committee is looking into those ideas.

"Connecticut is ahead of the curve," Polifroni said. "We have a joint task force that is bringing all the parties to the table.

"The plan needs to be multi-pronged and carefully constructed. Recruitment, debt forgiveness, scholarships – all have to happen at once. Money alone won’t solve this."

Sanford said any community can develop a similar task force.

Led by the local Rotary club, her community has assembled a group to look into solutions to stave off further shortages.

"It’s not just a hospital problem or a nursing problem; this is a community problem," Sanford said. "Things have to change."

B.

Top
  #2  
Old Feb 24, 2002, 10:09 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001

Interesting. Until last year, I was one of the 9% in Washington under 30. Know why? For several years in the early 90's, the hospitals were laying off nurses and hiring aides. New grads had no residency or preceptorship programs in the hospitals. Even some of the experienced nurses couldn't find jobs. The only option for new grads to work in the hospital was to LEAVE THE STATE. Way to shoot yourself in the foot, Washington.

Top
  #3  
Old Feb 28, 2002, 12:20 AM
-jt
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000

That was happening all over the country. There wasnt any state you could go to to escape it. You could only leave nursing to do that & many were forced to do just that. Thats why this "shoratge" is not the same as others. This one was manufactured by the hospitals themselves.

In the 90's managed care took a strong hold & cut reimbursements. Hospitals looked to make up the difference by cutting costs. They brought in "financial consultants" like Ernst & Young who knew nothing about patient care. The consultants saw that the hospitals largest expense was the nursing staff so they recommended the most cuts there. "You dont need 3 RNs to do this work. Get rid of 2 & add a less expensive UAP to the mix". And thats just what the hospitals did. All in the name of saving a buck. Of course they didnt save the buck by donating back a portion of their ridiculously huge salaries & perks. They kept those & got rid of nurses instead.

Lay-offs of nursing staff was happening all over the place. In every state. Vacant positions were eliminated or frozen. There was a freeze on hiring. Staff was cut to bare bones. New grads couldnt get hospital jobs. Experienced nurses were let go and found use for their skills (along with better compensation & more respect) in other fields. The hospitals didnt pay any attention to nurses warning that care was declining because they copuldnt do it all - until the facts of incidents spoke for themselves - but that took years.

Now theyre finding that they cut too much & when they want those nurses that they pushed out back again, the nurses dont want to come back. And the word was out that the job was unstable so students stayed away from the profession.

In the past couple of years, they came up with mandatory ot as a way to solve the problem of missing staff. Oh yes that helped a ton. It just pushed out more nurses, kept other nurses away, and reinforced to students that nursing is not the place to be. Why go thru all that schooling to be abused by your employer and not even paid well for the privilege?

The best way to fix the problem would be to significantly improve working conditions, salaries, benefits, and attitude toward nurses & then advertise that loud & clear. Why employers still refuse to do that when they need nurses so badly is illogical. When they are going to stop seeing everything in immediate dollar signs is beyond me. But they are not going to solve their shortage, no matter how many new students they fund, until they correct the working conditions and compensation. Once all those new students they lure in see what theyre in for, they'll be jumping ship too. And the cycle continues.

Top
  #4  
Old Feb 28, 2002, 04:35 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001

In the past they said, "Lets cut nurses so we can save money."

Now, "Lets tell them we need nurses, we know there aren't any, and we will still save money and look good."

Until there are mandatory staffing ratios, they will save money.

Top
  #5  
Old Feb 28, 2002, 06:53 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002

I feel badly but i know i am part of the problem. I don't think Nursing is the best profession anymore. I have been in it since 87 and it has gone through many changes. None of them good. I tell people to look into something else. The abuse on the body is not worth the money. I know people who install alarms that make more money. I know it's not about the money....but it sometimes should be. I am deciding now over 35 what to do next. Any Ideas?

Top
  #6  
Old Feb 28, 2002, 03:29 PM
-jt
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000

<An article found in the recent archives of the Cheyenne paper. Comment made by the WNA states 18% of nurses are busy doing something other than nursing.>

The comment is based on a Congressional Research Report from the General Accounting Office (GAO) in DC last May. The AHA went to Congress crying that "there just are no nurses to be found" & hospitals must be given more money from the Govt to pay for recruiting new students.

Nurses feared that they were being used as an excuse for the hospitals to get back the higher reimbursement from the govt that it had lost with managed care & also feared that any money given by the govt would be used by the hospitals for things other than nursing and that the govt would be paying for nursing improvements that we'd never see. Sooooooo....

Before doling out the dollars, Congress said to the AHA "lets just first see if its true that there are no nurses". So it commissioned a report from the GAO which found that there certainly ARE nurses available - almost 500,000 them nation-wide to be exact - all licensed but not working in nursing.

Considering that there are only 125,000 vacant nursing positions nation-wide but 500,000 licensed nurses not working, the report concluded that there is no real nursing shortage at the moment. There are enough licensed nurses to fill every available nurse position in the country even if just a fraction of them came back to work.

The report found that the number of available licensed nurses in this country who are not working in nursing at the moment is a full, mind-boggling 18% of the entire U.S. nursing workforce. So the report's question to the AHA is WHY?

The report concluded that there ARE more than enough nurses, that we do not have a shortage in numbers - we have what it called a "maldistribution" - meaning that the nurses ARE out there - just refusing to work in hospital jobs.

The report proved the AHA wrong in its claim that "there just are no nurses to be found" and it recommended that the employers go back to the drawing board & figure out WHY the nurses wont work for them & what the employers can do to change that.... and then do it.

Basically "fix it & they will come"

That report, released to Congress last May was the best thing that could have happened because it proved that what nurses have been saying all along is true. Its not a real shortage - its an employer- manufactured shortage. We are out there - we just will not put up with anymore abuse.

After that came out, Congress paid more attention to us & got on the ball. National legislation like the Safe Staffing Patient Care Act (which includes banning mandatory ot & establishing safe staffing levels) and the Nurse Retention-Quality Care Act (which includes other workplace improvements) started happening. You can read the report at:

107th Congress
'Maldistribution' of Nurses is More Likely Than Actual Shortage, Report Says
http://www.ana.org/gova/federal/legis/107/gcrs.htm


Last edited by -jt : Feb 28, 2002 at 04:07 PM.
Top
  #7  
Old Feb 28, 2002, 03:52 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Will anything happen?

Thanks for posting the article. I find it very interesting to read some of the proposed thoughts for "luring" more young people into our profession... The scholarships, loan forgiveness, and special mortgage rates are especially appealing.

I don't do patient care nursing anymore, but I still work as a RN in industry. My work conditions are not the same brutal conditions that most pt. care nurses face. I have done that in the past, and I doubt I will go back unless there is a significant change in the workload and the compensation. Some of these perks might make me consider a return to pt. care, even if only prn.

I just wonder if we will actually see something more that the "sign-on bonus wars" that have sprouted up in the last several years... Oh the thought of doing the job we all dreamed we could do when we were in nursing school, with a managable pt. load, time to eat a meal, 40 hour weeks, and a decent paycheck at the end of the week...

It may never happen, but we can dream...

George

Top
  #8  
Old Feb 28, 2002, 04:29 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Angry sign on bonuses

I had heard something rather disturbing before our semester break from a another woman in the nursing program (whoa run-on sentence!). She stated that her clinical instructor was so savvy, so sharp that she was traveling around in our "metropolitan" area and getting hired in as contingent just to get the sign on bonuses, knowing that she would only have to work 2 days out of the month and acruing up to 2000 in her pocket from each hospital. that mad me soo mad. I mean, I haven't even graduated yet, so I guess with her experience, along with every other nurse, the poor treatment justifies some sort of compensation. But if the hospitals are already so d@mn stingy with their cash, why abuse the system like that and leave that hospital and their staff in a no-win situation?
grrrrrrr

on another note....i want to be an advocate for better staffing and treatment of nurses. How can I get more involved? Unfortunately at my school, the members of SNA served more as a deterant to join than an encouragement--> very clique-y. It was ridiculous. Plus I am graduating in about 2 mths.. YEHAW!!!!
any suggestions???

Top
  #9  
Old Feb 28, 2002, 05:15 PM
SICU Queen's Avatar
C'est La Vie
Join Date: Jan 2002

I think wanting to be an advocate is an admirable thing, but you're going to get extremely frustrated very quickly. If you want to do it though, decide where you'd like to work and become active on one of the many committees that all hospitals seem to have nowadays. It may be helpful to have an actual nurse on one of those "committees"...

Good luck, and congratulations on your upcoming graduation. I hope you can keep your enthusiasm...

Kim (had a rough one at work last night..)

Top
  #10  
Old Feb 28, 2002, 05:36 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Talking

enthusiasm.....yes. I hope i maintain it as well. but ihave already made the decision to continue with schooling to become a WHNP at some point...so as least i have that. well i am interviewing for grad jobs now...so i will definitely get on a committee...to say the least.!!! Thanks for your post!

remember...YOU RAWK!

Top
Sponsored Links
 
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.



Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



New To Site?
Need Help?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 AM.

Nursing Shortage?

Copyright © 1996-2008, allnurses.com. All rights reserved.  allnurses.com, Inc. Advertising Information