#1 Nursing Community for Nurses: 294,660 Members

Log in   Sign up   Why join?   | Layout: Switch to narrow layout Color: gold style blue style rose style
Nursing Community for Nurses
Home Forums Articles Specialty Students Region Career Resources

Advanced Search Site Help Site Map

Medicare For All H.R. 676



Currently Online
Members: 158
Guests: 1,102
1,260

Job Spotlight
Oncology Nurse RN
Southlake, Texas
Forum Spotlight
Oncology Nursing

Nursing Degrees

Nursing Articles

Imagine.
Am I Meant To Be A Nurse?
Nurse
Health Website Analysis: allnurses.com
They Call Me The Swamp Nurse
Submit An Article

Nursing Jobs

Job Seeker: Employer:

Newsletter

Subscribe to the free allnurses.com email newsletter. We will keep you informed of nursing news, articles, discussions, and more.

Enter your email address:

Read current:
Nursing Newsletter

How-To allnurses

allnurses videos

Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses

The largest most active online nursing community. Join 294,660 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.

Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #61  
Old Jan 09, 2008, 11:28 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Re: Medicare For All H.R. 676

The problem with our healthcare system NOW is insurance companies... you really want a gooberment-backed one to be running the whole show?[/quote]

__________________________________________________ __________

"gooberment-backed", is not government run!

Top

The following member says Thank You:
  #62  
Old Jan 09, 2008, 11:40 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Re: Medicare For All H.R. 676

Does anyone know what country(s) without government healthcare of some kind have good healthcare?
How does it work? Is there a system?[/quote]

All countries have government healthcare, by virtue of sanctioning the providers of it, with licensing, laws of regulation, etc.

Not all countries sanction insurance companies that make billions of dollars from forced participation and profiteer CEOs, with less benefit by consumers of healthcare.

Canada has a wonderful system called "single payer" ("a _________ by any other name is still the same". Physicians and medical economists run it well. I saw it conceived by 7 physicians in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, in 1962 and have relatives (some elderly) all over Canada benefiting from it now. You won't find luxurious facilities and furniture there, with decorator driven lobbies, and each one with its own "state of the art" diagnostic machines (those are distributed to regional centers wisely, according to population figures, as competition for them isn't needed). Some day, I'll go back unless we can get something here of equivalant quality.

Top

The following members say Thank You:
  #63  
Old Jan 09, 2008, 05:59 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Re: Medicare For All H.R. 676

IF it's so wonderful, why do our Canadian friends come to the US for care? The wait for an out-patient c-t or mri is outrageous. And one couple's son and daughter-in-law are physicians! I love Canada and visit as much as I can. But for medical care, I'm very thankful I live in the US. I know Tony and his wife are fabulous, caring doctors (he's rehab and she's pediatric trauma) but as soon as the children are old enough, they want to emigrate to the states. Right now, they're pre-school and my friend is back-up babysitter.

Top
  #64  
Old Jan 09, 2008, 06:18 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Re: Medicare For All H.R. 676

I just read back over the thread and noticed that Clee1's insurance is similar to the change I made. I pay the first $2,000 and then my coverage reverts to exactly what I had before. I'm feeling pretty heady over that decision because I've found out there's a 20% discount for cash. Also, I've learn to check with different imaging centers because their cost vary GREATLY. I just paid $125 for x-rays and that included the radiologist's fee. The first center wanted $195 for the x-rays and the radiologist billed separately at a later date. Hope the ortho also gives a discount for cash! We see him tomorrow to evaluate the fracture. I'm feeling some of Clee's POWER!

Top
  #65  
Old Jan 09, 2008, 11:04 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Re: Medicare For All H.R. 676

Being sick or injured is never wonderful. We will all die someday.
All we can work for is to do the best we can to ensure Americans are as healthy as possible.

I wish I had been as sophisticated the first time my shoulder was injured.
It took 18 weeks for me to get treatment. Waiting for authorization to see an orthopod and then waiting for authorization for the MRI, to see him again, and finally to start physical therapy had me disabled for months.
No one told me I could just go pay.
And I was too sleep deprived, in pain, or just stupid to just go to a specialist.

I did that the second time, 6 years later. It cost more than $500.00 but was well worth it. Then I started PT and took several years to get the insurance company to reimburse me but it was worth it not to suffer in pain unable to work.

I didn't sue for pain and suffering.

Top

The following member says Thank You:
  #66  
Old Jan 10, 2008, 12:07 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Re: Medicare For All H.R. 676

Originally Posted by pannie View Post
IF it's so wonderful, why do our Canadian friends come to the US for care? The wait for an out-patient c-t or mri is outrageous. And one couple's son and daughter-in-law are physicians! I love Canada and visit as much as I can. But for medical care, I'm very thankful I live in the US. I know Tony and his wife are fabulous, caring doctors (he's rehab and she's pediatric trauma) but as soon as the children are old enough, they want to emigrate to the states. Right now, they're pre-school and my friend is back-up babysitter.
It seems odd to me that physicians couldn't find a way to have the diagnostic tests they wanted, as my niece (a palliative MD) knows enough people, and has earned enough respect in her field, that what she wants for herself and her patients, she gets. As with our system, it's all about who you know, and clout.

If I were to guess, I'd venture that they bought health insurance for Canadians visiting the USA (which my sister does every year, to winter in Palm Springs at a cost of $2500 for 4 months!). Then they wanted to know the availability of CT scans and MRIs here - readily available, as each hospital and some radiology offices have their own.

In Canada, it's a matter of acuity that dictates how quickly things are done. My brother-in-law had both his knees replaced in Toronto while he was in his 60s (he's 80, now) - no problem having it done by the son of an orthopedic surgeon I knew from my nursing school days in Montreal. The father was a "die-hard" patient advocate, and woe to the nurse who didn't change his patients' sheets daily, without a crease, or left out something from his orders (which were exacting!).

The son was a different sort, we found. My brother-in-law Ed couldn't stand his roommate in the rehab hospital's moaning from pain, and noticed that the nurses never gave it in time or answered his call. (By the way, patients transfer to "rehab hospitals" for PT following those surgeries, so they actually do the prescribed exercises for a whole week, and equipment can be utilized by many, all the time. No private rooms exist there.) When a nurse responded to Ed's call, he asked her why she hadn't responded to his roommate's one. She responded nastily that the roommate hadn't said "please". ???&#%

Infuriated, Ed called the supervisor that evening, but she didn't respond, calling his doctor instead. The doctor (the son of the one in Montreal) arrived hastily and blasted Ed for "bothering HIS nurses with trivialities". When they told me about that over the 'phone, it was all I could do to resist the temptation to arrange for that doctor's loss of his license. The roommate was moved to a different room........

Different priorities.

Now to hazard a guess about the physicians you wrote about in Canada who want to emigrate to the USA. They may have wanted to look at the availability of work, the money they could make, etc. You haven't said if they actually needed the MRI and CT scan, I hope they did.

Most Canadians resort to care in the USA if they are not getting what they think they need as fast as they think they need it, in Canada - and have the funds to support coming here. Doctors there are quite willing to do tests our doctors here would put off, due to the cost and the possibility that their patients' insurance would balk at covering it, if it wasn't absolutely needed (or if a non medical insurance evaluator thought the patients' situation/age/prognosis didn't warrant the expense).

Many medicines that aren't available to us, are OTC in Canada (such as codeine for pain), so doctors' visits aren't their only option when they have a severe headache or sprained ankle. Fewer Canadians than Americans are addicted to codeine, and with rapid symptomatic relief available, they function sooner and lose less time at work or school. Preventive medical care and education lowers the morbidity and mortality rates there, especially for infants.

The educational system is far better in Canada (OK, I'm chauvanistic about it), and since students are examined at the end of each year on all the subject matter taught the whole year (not just one semester), there is greater retention of information taught. In the last year of high school, all the subjects taught for all 5 years could be on the final exam. American college students have a hard time at Canadian Universities, and usually go back to the USA to get their degrees.

I could go on, but you do get the drift........

Top
  #67  
Old Jan 10, 2008, 12:16 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Re: Medicare For All H.R. 676

What passion, such angst! Yet little concern for others, made this country full of megalopases, instead of villages where compassion and kindness are prevalent.

Top
  #68  
Old Jan 10, 2008, 12:33 AM
ksilty (Female)
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Re: Medicare For All H.R. 676

Many people don't realize that Medicare is not free. There are premiums - close to $100/mo that is deducted from an already modest SocSec check. Medicare only pays 80% of covered procedures. The first day of hospitalization has a "copay" of hundreds, it was almost $800. the last time I checked. If you buy Medigap insurance, the premiums can cost $3 - $4 hundred a month, and often does not cover meds, that is a seperate, and mandatory, policy. A chronic illness can wipe out your savings. Medicare is in danger of running out of money, we may not even "enjoy" it. THe bottom line is that unless we work at making healthcare delivery less expensive, Univeral HC simply will not work. It will cost too much.

Top

The following members say Thank You:
  #69  
Old Jan 10, 2008, 02:57 AM
HM2Viking's Avatar
HM2Viking (Male)
TARDIS
Join Date: Apr 2006
Re: Medicare For All H.R. 676

Originally Posted by pannie View Post
I just read back over the thread and noticed that Clee1's insurance is similar to the change I made. I pay the first $2,000 and then my coverage reverts to exactly what I had before. I'm feeling pretty heady over that decision because I've found out there's a 20% discount for cash. Also, I've learn to check with different imaging centers because their cost vary GREATLY. I just paid $125 for x-rays and that included the radiologist's fee. The first center wanted $195 for the x-rays and the radiologist billed separately at a later date. Hope the ortho also gives a discount for cash! We see him tomorrow to evaluate the fracture. I'm feeling some of Clee's POWER!
Its very difficult to negotiate from a gurney....

Canadian waiting times are overstated...


Last edited by HM2Viking : Jan 10, 2008 at 03:00 AM.
Top

The following member says Thank You:
  #70  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 11:21 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Re: Medicare For All H.R. 676

Originally Posted by spacenurse View Post
One question:
WHO SHOULD BE DENIED HEALTHCARE?
Insurance companies would say "anyone who has been ill or has a disability".

Anti illegal immigration folks would say, "anyone who isn't here legally".

Young people might say "Anyone old who expects free care after incontinence sets in", forgetting that older folks took care of them when they were incontinent........

Those in need of psychiatric care, especially when expensive medications that could keep them more sane are unaffordable (some are $9./capsule, and the daily dose is 3-4 capsules, or hospitalization is required - those wards/units are on the streets of American cities.

Those who are unable to get/keep jobs, as health insurance companies charge employers $1500+/month for employees over 55 years of age, and when they could get Medicare at 65 years of age, charge more, by not allowing Medicare as the primary insurer.

Those committing violent acts due to genetic predisposition, do get free heallthcare - usually in jail, with other inmates.

Those who fake job related disabilities do get free healthcare.

Now children will have free healthcare, but may have to go into foster care when their parents become seriously ill or disabled, (due to having gone without healthcare too long because of lack of health insurance).

Healthcare IS BROKEN, AND WE DO NEED TO FIX IT!

Top

The following members say Thank You:
Remove this ad - Upgrade your Membership Sponsored Links
 
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
re:medicare pt.in tn. southernlady48 Tennessee Nurses 1 Jan 12, 2008 11:16 PM


Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



New To Site?
Need Help?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 AM.

Medicare For All H.R. 676

Copyright © 1996-2008, allnurses.com. All rights reserved.  allnurses.com, Inc. Advertising Information