Print And Share

by NRSKarenRN Staff

From PA Nurses Assoc eupdate:

AMA House of Delegates Considers Limits on Nursing Education and Practice

Posted: 06/13/08

Attention Pennsylvania Nurses:

The American Medical Association (AMA) House of Delegates plans to consider resolutions at its June 14-18 meeting, to place limits on nursing education and practice. Resolution 214, "Doctor of Nursing Practice," would require physician supervision for DNPs. Resolution 303, "Protection of the Titles 'Doctor,' 'Resident' and 'Residency,'" would limit the use of these terms to physicians, dentists and podiatrists. While these resolutions are policy statements, they set the agenda for state medical associations as well as the AMA itself, to advocate for state and federal action. Please click on the links below to view the AMA resolutions and PSNA/ANA’s responses to them:

• AMA resolution 303
• AMA resolution 214
• PSNA Response Letter
• ANA Response to AMA resolution 303
• ANA Response to AMA resolution 214

From ANA's response to AMA resolution 214:

...February 2007 report entitled "Changes in Healthcare Professions’ Scope of Practice: Legislative Considerations." This report was drafted collaboratively by representatives of six healthcare organizations, including the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) – and the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB). This report notes that "It is no longer reasonable to expect each profession to have a completely unique scope of practice, exclusive of all others. Overlap among professions is necessary. No one profession actually owns a skill or activity in and of itself."

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, retrieved June 6, 2008, http://www.ncsbn.org/ScopeofPractice.pdf

[elkpark]

Re: AMA House of Delegates Considers Limits on on Nursing Education and Practice

Well, that didn't take long, did it ... Just what us jaded, cynical old-timers were predicting. I hope Dr. Mundinger's happy!

[TraumaNurse07]

Re: AMA House of Delegates Considers Limits on on Nursing Education and Practice

Wow, AMA is just a bunch of nurse-fearing elitists.

[caliotter3]

Re: AMA House of Delegates Considers Limits on on Nursing Education and Practice

Hmm. Seems we're ruffling some feathers on some very old birds?

[MikeyJ]

Re: AMA House of Delegates Considers Limits on on Nursing Education and Practice

I applaud the AMA!

[TraumaNurse07]

Re: AMA House of Delegates Considers Limits on on Nursing Education and Practice

Perhaps we should start a petition? I mean, as it is said in some of those response letters, there are 2.9 million of us.

[TraumaNurse07]

Re: AMA House of Delegates Considers Limits on on Nursing Education and Practice

Originally Posted by MikeyJ

I applaud the AMA!

What for?

[GoLytely]

Re: AMA House of Delegates Considers Limits on on Nursing Education and Practice

They're scared.

[herring_RN]

Re: AMA House of Delegates Considers Limits on on Nursing Education and Practice

Some AMA history:

...Specifically designed to provide federal funds for improving maternal and infant care, the Sheppard-Towner Act enabled hundreds of nurses to visit homes, give health education and encourage prevention of disease.
The 1915 death rate for infants, 100 deaths for every thousand births in America, dropped to 69 deaths per thousand by 1928...

...In 1929 the Sheppard-Towner Act was allowed to lapse. Joining forces with political conservatives, the American Medical Association had damned the Act as "wasteful and extravagant, unproductive of results and tending to promote communism."...

http://www.neonatology.org/classics/mj1980/ch08.html

[ann945n]

Re: AMA House of Delegates Considers Limits on on Nursing Education and Practice

*sigh* didnt see that one coming