Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,875 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.
| No. 30 |
May 05, 2009, 05:29 PM
Re: Paramedic triage Originally Posted by MassED two separate roles with different, though equally important, skills, both making a great team. That's how it works in my ER. If there weren't differences, then we would have had the same training and the same national certification.
That's pretty much what I said on the second page of this discussion.  I was just hoping to clarify for the masses that paramedic education is a little more extensive than many nurses realize. Yes, paramedics operate under protocols, but I guarantee we (most of us, at any rate!) do understand the rationale behind them, and we medics often provide more than "simple information" when bringing patients in the back door. But again, I'm not all about having paramedics in triage, either, as I said in my initial post in this thread. But I am all about understanding, mutual respect, and working together for the good of the patient.
| | Advertisement Sponsored Links | | | | No. 31 |
May 05, 2009, 06:36 PM
Updated
May 05, 2009 at 06:48 PM by opus13
Re: Paramedic triage Originally Posted by Intubate89 Hi there,
I work at a level 1 trauma center, average census >300/day and frequently work triage which is staffed with a minimum of 3 RNs, sometimes 5 depending on the census.
Aside from that, I appreciate how medics work and function in the field but there exist fundamental differences between the professions. Medics are taught to follow and function according to protocols. Nurses are able to think outside the protocol.
With all due respect it sounds as if you do not fuuly understand paramedic education. Paramedic education focuses on critical thinking and assessment skills not just following protocols, which in most areas are called guidelines and allow for flexability, and these are not even looked at until you apply for medical control after graduation, this is because medics who cannot properly assess or think for themselves kill pts. Paramedics have a very deep knowledge within their scope of practice. A good paramedic program is an associates program or 16 to 18 month non degree program which runs straight through without any school breaks like a semester based program. This doesn't include clinical hour of which I did almost as many clinical hours as classroom hours in medic school I did 900 hrs of clinical just in ride time, ED MICU and CCU, not counting OB, burn, OR or pedi.
Now, as a new graduate nurse I can tell you that I didn't learn anything new in the areas of cardiology, respiratory, neuro, or pharmacology, other areas I learned much more in nursing school. In fact I learned more in my paramedic training about trauma than in nursing school. This makes sense since 80 to 90 percent of paramedic education focuses on these areas, we don't learn much about other areas except where the complications can kill you quickly or are major issues like D.M. or sickle cell.
As far a triage is concerned, orientation to a triage system is required regardless of you skill level, both RN's and Paramedics can due it equally well with exceptions based on the level of experience they each have. I've seen both do triage, some can and some shouldn't. In fact before one of the hospitals we transport to went computerized at triage we frequently did our own triage including assigning acuity and decide main ED, or fast track and would just check with the charge nurse for room or waiting room.
I hope this doesn't sound like a flame it's not meant to, it's just that your comments seen to reflect the common misconceptions of ems education. This is something ems has done to itself because of all the different forms ems comes in, volunteer, municipal, fire based and private, this lack of consistancy is one of my pet peeves. I believe ems education can and should progress but we are to busy fighting amongst ourselves to advance as nursing has done. Unlike nurses who may differ in how they practice but still organize to advance their profession, ems models fight against each other which prohibits advancement. Until some types of ems disappear or are regulated to first responder roles only there will not be any unity to push for education changes. I'll save my opinion on what type should be the model because it doesn't belong here and would just open a giant can of worms with flames everywhere.
Karl
| | No. 32 |
May 05, 2009, 07:34 PM
Updated
May 05, 2009 at 07:52 PM by ivanh3
Re: Paramedic triage Originally Posted by MassED I would be against this - they are not nurses. They can provide simple information, but as far as ordering and understanding rationale, no. They are not appropriate replacements.
What a very ignorant and offensive thing to say. Paramedics don't understand rationale? On what do you base this? Please tell me you have some inner, working knowledge of how paramedics are trained. I am not saying all paramedics, but every paramedic I know who went on to nursing school says the same thing: I learned as much or more about patient care as a medic than as a nurse. Every single one. You see paramedics don't study "paramedic theory". We study patient care. We study A/P, patho, pharm, etc. We learn how to think on our feet. We learn how to outreach to the community. And a very big YES: we learn about the rationale behind many things. Do we own the patent on this? Newp. But guess what? Neither does nursing. Originally Posted by MassED in spotting emergent situations, yes, but placed as initial triage through registration for all ER patients, no.
Again, that is just plain silly. FYI, paramedics DO triage successfully in many hospitals. I have seen it. I have done it. Originally Posted by MassED Paramedics do not get the same training as RN's do. Nurses have at a minimum of 2 years for their degree. Paramedics have, what, a year?? As far as intubation, extrication, and other emergent in the field situations, paramedics are the top choice. Not for triaging - we are trained to see the entire clinical picture, as RN's.
You are right. Paramedics don't get the same training. I would say we get better training, but that is just my opinion. But it is opinion based on being both a paramedic and a nurse, and also knowing many paramedics who went on to nursing school. So please tell me: what part of the clinical picture do RNs see that paramedics do not? Please elaborate and be precise. Originally Posted by MassED any EMT or paramedic could do a great job, given more training, would then be... an RN!!!!
Or just a better trained paramedic. When I was a paramedic working in the ED, I trained many RNs. So by your logic then at some point before graduation a nursing student knows as much as paramedic? Do you really believe that? Originally Posted by MassED two separate roles with different, though equally important, skills, both making a great team. That's how it works in my ER. If there weren't differences, then we would have had the same training and the same national certification.
No we wouldn't. Why? Because of nursing political power. While I agree that the roles started out as separate, many paramedics work solely in the hospital setting. Why? Often it is better pay, benefits, schedule, and tuition reimbursement.
A previous poster didn't respond to a point I made earlier, but I think it bears repeating. Not so long ago new grad RNs were either discouraged or prohibited from working in the ER as a first gig. That changed only because of the staffing shortage and not because of some improvement in nursing education. In fact, at least one hospital in my area is not hiring new grad RNs in the ED because of cutbacks. If nurses learn so much in school then why can't they just come out and work as ED nurses? Why an additional 4-6 months of training? Full time. If you want to compare a new grad medic to an RN that has several years of experience then please do. Or...go to an ER that lets paramedics utilize their skills and compare those medics to RNs with a similar amount of time on the job. Tell me what you see then.
Ivan
| | No. 33 |
May 05, 2009, 07:52 PM
Re: Paramedic triage Originally Posted by opus13 This is something ems has done to itself because of all the different forms ems comes in, volunteer, municipal, fire based and private, this lack of consistency is one of my pet peeves. I believe ems education can and should progress but we are to busy fighting amongst ourselves to advance as nursing has done.
Karl
Karl, you make some good points. One major step for EMT education is the move by the National Registry to require EMT programs to be accredited by the NREMT. I believe this obligation has to be met by 2013. Up until I moved to Georgia a few years ago, I taught at a Colorado community college. Our program was very complete. Students were taught urine cath placement, NG/OG tube placement, etc to better reflect that a growing number of medics are working in the hospital environment.
Ivan
| | No. 34 |
May 06, 2009, 06:49 AM
Re: Paramedic triage Originally Posted by ivanh3 What a very ignorant and offensive thing to say. Paramedics don't understand rationale? On what do you base this? Please tell me you have some inner, working knowledge of how paramedics are trained. I am not saying all paramedics, but every paramedic I know who went on to nursing school says the same thing: I learned as much or more about patient care as a medic than as a nurse. Every single one. You see paramedics don't study "paramedic theory". We study patient care. We study A/P, patho, pharm, etc. We learn how to think on our feet. We learn how to outreach to the community. And a very big YES: we learn about the rationale behind many things. Do we own the patent on this? Newp. But guess what? Neither does nursing.
Again, that is just plain silly. FYI, paramedics DO triage successfully in many hospitals. I have seen it. I have done it.
You are right. Paramedics don't get the same training. I would say we get better training, but that is just my opinion. But it is opinion based on being both a paramedic and a nurse, and also knowing many paramedics who went on to nursing school. So please tell me: what part of the clinical picture do RNs see that paramedics do not? Please elaborate and be precise.
Or just a better trained paramedic. When I was a paramedic working in the ED, I trained many RNs. So by your logic then at some point before graduation a nursing student knows as much as paramedic? Do you really believe that?
No we wouldn't. Why? Because of nursing political power. While I agree that the roles started out as separate, many paramedics work solely in the hospital setting. Why? Often it is better pay, benefits, schedule, and tuition reimbursement.
A previous poster didn't respond to a point I made earlier, but I think it bears repeating. Not so long ago new grad RNs were either discouraged or prohibited from working in the ER as a first gig. That changed only because of the staffing shortage and not because of some improvement in nursing education. In fact, at least one hospital in my area is not hiring new grad RNs in the ED because of cutbacks. If nurses learn so much in school then why can't they just come out and work as ED nurses? Why an additional 4-6 months of training? Full time. If you want to compare a new grad medic to an RN that has several years of experience then please do. Or...go to an ER that lets paramedics utilize their skills and compare those medics to RNs with a similar amount of time on the job. Tell me what you see then.
Ivan
Ivan, I respect the fact that you were a paramedic prior to becoming a nurse. RN's, as well as paramedics, are no more ready fresh out of school to work in the ER as paramedics are ready to quickly intubate in the field. I would never suggest a newly graduated RN to start in the ER, even if they feel they are able and ready. They are not.
You seem to want to debate the fact that you believe paramedics are above RN's, and I won't do that with you. Each has their place. If Paramedics were adequate to triage, staff and manage total patient care in the ER, then what is stopping hospitals from hiring them to those positions, may I ask?
"According to ANA’s 1992 Position Statement, "Other regulatory entities have been pressured to lower agency staffing standards, for instance by allowing emergency medical technicians to function in the emergency room without registered nurse supervision or by substituting unlicensed personnel for licensed nurses. These unlicensed persons have not completed nursing education programs, or met other licensing requirements. In many instances, substitution of unlicensed personnel for licensed nurses clearly violates state nurse practice acts. At the very least, it is not in the interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the public".
"According to Mary Jagim, RN, president of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), "The use of paramedics in the emergency department would fall under the ENA Position Statement of use of unlicensed personnel in the ED, which is that the registered professional nurse is an essential element in the provision of quality, safe, and cost efficient care whether involved in patient care, or in directing non-RN caregivers." http://home.earthlink.net/~douglaspage/id77.html http://www.ena.org/about/position/pdfs/usenon-rn.pdf | | No. 35 |
May 06, 2009, 08:55 AM
Re: Paramedic triage Originally Posted by MassED You seem to want to debate the fact that you believe paramedics are above RN's, and I won't do that with you. Each has their place. If Paramedics were adequate to triage, staff and manage total patient care in the ER, then what is stopping hospitals from hiring them to those positions, may I ask?
"According to ANA’s 1992 Position Statement, "Other regulatory entities have been pressured to lower agency staffing standards, for instance by allowing emergency medical technicians to function in the emergency room without registered nurse supervision or by substituting unlicensed personnel for licensed nurses. These unlicensed persons have not completed nursing education programs, or met other licensing requirements. In many instances, substitution of unlicensed personnel for licensed nurses clearly violates state nurse practice acts. At the very least, it is not in the interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the public".
"According to Mary Jagim, RN, president of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), "The use of paramedics in the emergency department would fall under the ENA Position Statement of use of unlicensed personnel in the ED, which is that the registered professional nurse is an essential element in the provision of quality, safe, and cost efficient care whether involved in patient care, or in directing non-RN caregivers." http://home.earthlink.net/~douglaspage/id77.html http://www.ena.org/about/position/pdfs/usenon-rn.pdf You ask the question and then you answer it: What stops hospitals? Nursing political bodies/lobbyists. I find it ironic that you would quote a 17 year old ANA statement. It was wrong then. It is wrong now. Paramedics are not unlicensed. All working paramedics are licensed. They were licensed in 1992. They are licensed now. There is no study, not one, that shows that patient outcomes with hospital based paramedics are less (or more) favorable. That makes me wonder about the motivation behind statements like that. Are they truly about patient safety or is job security the issue? I expect it is somewhere in between. It is wrong for groups like these to lump paramedics in with nursing assistants/patient care techs. I am not putting paramedics above RNs. So let me be clear about what I am saying. I am saying that with the current state of both nursing and EMT education, that either of these two pools of talent can equally succeed in the hospital setting given the same type of new grad or transition training. Now this is based only on my experience, but I can't find a single reason to think that I am wrong, and no one has been able to demonstrate to me anything other than position statements which do not seem to backed with any study either. | | No. 36 |
May 06, 2009, 10:09 AM
Re: Paramedic triage
[quote=MassED;3608489]Ivan, I respect the fact that you were a paramedic prior to becoming a nurse. RN's, as well as paramedics, are no more ready fresh out of school to work in the ER as paramedics are ready to quickly intubate in the field. I would never suggest a newly graduated RN to start in the ER, even if they feel they are able and ready. They are not."
Having been a RN as well as a Paramedic I have to disagree with that statement. Paramedics have a high level of diverse skill training and experience, much more so than RN students, along with their classroom training and must be able to perform all skills quickly in the field, right after graduation. They hit the ground running, vs new grad RN's that need preceptorship as they do to not have enough high quality clinical time. My first call as a Paramedic was a full code that was worked with just a basic EMT.  The pt. was successfully resuscitated and DC from the hospital 9 days later. Working a full code by myself was possible due to the training I received as a medic.
The difference between medic school and RN school is that in medic school, all the BS is cut out and critical thinking and skills are taught in a high pressure, competitive environment which quickly weeds out students that are not up to par.
That being said, while I do feel paramedics can appropriately triage, I do not feel they should as RN's again are being replaced by cheaper staff, jeopardizing our future. With the use of medication aides, and non RN's triaging, pt. care tech's that start IV's and cath., we are eliminating our position and jeopardizing pt. care with semiskilled personnel who can not assess the big picture as an RN can.
| | No. 37 |
May 06, 2009, 10:26 AM
Re: Paramedic triage
[quote=awsmom8;3608783]
Originally Posted by MassED Ivan, I respect the fact that you were a paramedic prior to becoming a nurse. RN's, as well as paramedics, are no more ready fresh out of school to work in the ER as paramedics are ready to quickly intubate in the field. I would never suggest a newly graduated RN to start in the ER, even if they feel they are able and ready. They are not."
Having been a RN as well as a Paramedic I have to disagree with that statement. Paramedics have a high level of diverse skill training and experience, much more so than RN students, along with their classroom training and must be able to perform all skills quickly in the field, right after graduation. They hit the ground running, vs new grad RN's that need preceptorship as they do to not have enough high quality clinical time. My first call as a Paramedic was a full code that was worked with just a basic EMT.  The pt. was successfully resuscitated and DC from the hospital 9 days later. Working a full code by myself was possible due to the training I received as a medic.
The difference between medic school and RN school is that in medic school, all the BS is cut out and critical thinking and skills are taught in a high pressure, competitive environment which quickly weeds out students that are not up to par.
That being said, while I do feel paramedics can appropriately triage, I do not feel they should as RN's again are being replaced by cheaper staff, jeopardizing our future. With the use of medication aides, and non RN's triaging, pt. care tech's that start IV's and cath., we are eliminating our position and jeopardizing pt. care with semiskilled personnel who can not assess the big picture as an RN can.
I have to disagree with you. Where I went to nursing school (Washington state) was extremely competitive and difficult, with an emphasis on clinical time. Critical thinking is not BS, nor is nursing school. I hated it at the time, but hindsight is 20/20. It was absolutely essential - all of it. You seem bent on making it out that new nurses are not ready in any way to function independently. This is not true. RN's are as different in skill and competency as Paramedics are... it's difficult to make a blanket statement and generalize. We KNOW all nurses are not created equal, just as Paramedics are not. You, I'm sure, will disagree. So I see on your credentials that you are now an RN. If being a Paramedic was adequate, then why did you move on (or up?) to obtaining your RN??
| | No. 38 |
May 06, 2009, 10:30 AM
Re: Paramedic triage Originally Posted by ivanh3 You ask the question and then you answer it: What stops hospitals? Nursing political bodies/lobbyists. I find it ironic that you would quote a 17 year old ANA statement. It was wrong then. It is wrong now. Paramedics are not unlicensed. All working paramedics are licensed. They were licensed in 1992. They are licensed now. There is no study, not one, that shows that patient outcomes with hospital based paramedics are less (or more) favorable. That makes me wonder about the motivation behind statements like that. Are they truly about patient safety or is job security the issue? I expect it is somewhere in between. It is wrong for groups like these to lump paramedics in with nursing assistants/patient care techs. I am not putting paramedics above RNs. So let me be clear about what I am saying. I am saying that with the current state of both nursing and EMT education, that either of these two pools of talent can equally succeed in the hospital setting given the same type of new grad or transition training. Now this is based only on my experience, but I can't find a single reason to think that I am wrong, and no one has been able to demonstrate to me anything other than position statements which do not seem to backed with any study either.
no one has been able to "demonstrate to YOU." Hmph. Interesting. I do think there is a place for experienced RN's and Paramedics to work collaboratively in an ER, with clear roles within a team.
Here's ENA's more up to date information on this issue - this is only one example of a Wisconsin hospital on their policy for hiring Paramedics in the ER. http://www.ena.org/document_share/do...icroleined.doc | | No. 39 |
May 06, 2009, 10:37 AM
Updated
May 06, 2009 at 10:53 AM by awsmfun
Re: Paramedic triage
Maybe it was the nursing school I went to but I never got a chance to start 15 IV's in one day, nor defibrillate 3 different pts, on the same day, or give multiple IVP's or hang many piggybacks on the same day as I did when I was a paramedic student. I was also an LPN when I was a medic. I felt paramedic school placed a bigger emphasis on skills as well as classroom. There were nurses in my class that graduated that had only started on or two IV's, and a few that did not get the opportunity to cath or insert an NG tube. The reason I became a paramedic as our area did not have one, despite the fire dept sending 3 people through paramedic training, only to have them not pass their boards. It got old after a while watching the EMT's bring in pt's to the ER I worked at BLS. I felt our community deserved better care and went to medic school. I also taught as a paramedic instructor at a community college, precepted medic students in the ER and out in the field.
I finished my RN when I got tired of the snow chains falling off the rig and having to reapply them several times, arriving at a call soaking wet. Being a medic is somewhat a young person's job, and I was getting older and had kids. I was also the only paramedic in my area, and it got a little old being on call 24 hrs a day/7 days a week for many years. And pay as an RN was a big motivator as I could do many of the same things as a medic but in the comfort of a hospital (air conditioning and heat!), with scheduled hours!!!!!
| | 74 members
958 guests 1,032 | 48 | | | 1 | | | 13 | | | 2 | | | 10 | | | 17 | | | 11 | | | 16 | | | 16 | | | 43 | | | 14 | | | 21 | | | 23 | | | 20 | | | 24 | | |
Nursing News