Re: EMS abuse: The Ride to get High Originally Posted by mwboswell
Okay, so let me ask the question, "why do you continue to transport the above-mentioned people in your ambulance?".....
"Why do you allow precious 911 resources to be tied up transporting them in the system?"...
What's that you say? Your boss says you have to?
Oh, okay, well what are you doing to lobby for change?
Why can you do at your job, community, elected leaders levels to effect change?
-MB
I hope you're not suggesting that I'm part of the blame here. To answer your questions, I have refused people for lice and herpes and pregnancy tests, but that doesn't stop them from calling 911 and tying up the resources. And as a paramedic, you have to be extremely careful if you refuse to transport someone. I'm sure you can understand the ramifications.
When I worked fulltime as a paramedic my boss would say, if someone calls 911 you better put 'em in a truck and take 'em wherever they want to go. He was an elected official and more interested in potential voters than the welfare of the community and certainly not the respect of EMS workers.
It's easy for you or anyone to ask those questions, but what would you suggest? If a paramedic tried to go public they would lose their job in a heartbeat. where is an effective EMS lobby? the answer is: it doesn't exist. One of the reasons I became an RN, it's much more organized and effective. My job as a firefighter/medic is now part time and my fire chief trusts my clinical judgement as to whether or not someone needs an ambulance ride. But it's easier and safer (for the medic) to just put them in the truck and ride 'em to the ER. I've seen plenty of medics get fired for not taking a stubbed toe seriously.
Nursing News