Putting the BSN in perspective
I agree Kevin that last post was something to get the mind around, too slippery. I also want to throw my thoughts in this BSN/RN discussion and highlight something I've only briefly seen here. I believe the BSN can be overrated. It does provide a strong undergraduate curriculum for a young student who is going to college immediately after high school. It may cumulatively even teach them how to make logical arguments, write, research, and improve interpersonal skills. But the BSN is evolving as many of us know. It is becoming less the formal four year degree and options for attaining it are multiplying. I believe this is the case for two reasons. First, the community colleges are doing an excellent job of training a large percentage of our nurses. They often have nursing instructors who maintain hands on experience in the clinical arena. These instructors often do not have the expectations for research or writing that university based instructors do and consequently can give a great deal of face time to their students. The community college option also cuts away the "fat" off a BSN degree. Thus a mature adult can enter into the profession quicker than having to apply and complete a BSN program, not to mention it is often cheaper. The second reason has to do with the type of person attending these community colleges. I concede that the quality of students attending community colleges may fall within a broader continuum but it is those students that fall in the top half to which I am referring. Often these student are older, they have previous college education, professional and life experiences, etc. They have learned in their previous careers how to work in groups, how to write an essay, make presentations, and have gone to conferences about leadership, education, or ethics. This is why CRNA programs are increasingly (and the profession of nursing as a whole) becoming more progressive in their admissions criteria and open to diverse candidates. I believe because of my past education (all of which except my ADN was in non-science fields) and experience, I was accepted by multiple schools which did not require a BSN. In fact I know Gonzaga, TWU, TCU, MSA, U of Pitt, Rush, and Newman all accept applications from non BSN trained nurses. Now I am unsure how each school calculates the absence of a BSN but all the schools I contacted assured me they believe that a community college graduate can be equally adept if not at times clinically more competent . Spending another year and more money to attain something which I thought would have been for me redundant was not an option. So if you are looking to become a CRNA and do not have a BSN, contact the schools you are interested in. If you have a passion for physiology, like science, honed your skills at a busy and high acuity hospital, embraced continuing education, the absence of a BSN will be a footnote.
Nursing News