Nurses Helping Nurses
allnurses Network: Central | Jobs | Books | Newsletter
allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
Home General News Blogs Articles Students Region Specialty Degrees F.A.Q.
Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) /

DL vs. Fast Track Sympathetic Stimulation



Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,564 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.

May 28, 2005 09:21 PM

DL vs. Fast Track Sympathetic Stimulation


I always have believed, through my readings and lectures, that the greatest sympathetic stimulation is with the direct laryngoscopy, ("cold steal is the real deal"). My classmate begs to differ, and says the most stimulation is from the ETT passing thru and being settled in the vocal cords. This topic came up in discussion because of the fast track LMA, in which there is no actual DL, and therefore, I thought NO (or little) sympathetic stimulation. What do you think, and do you know of any research articles related to this topic?

My theory was the Fast Track was a great way to intubate fragile cardiac patients b/c of the lack of DL stimulation. I may be way off.


Share

Search Tags
None
Top

 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links
 
Reply
2 Comments
No. 1
Old May 29, 2005, 09:24 AM

Originally Posted by miloisstinky
I always have believed, through my readings and lectures, that the greatest sympathetic stimulation is with the direct laryngoscopy, ("cold steal is the real deal"). My classmate begs to differ, and says the most stimulation is from the ETT passing thru and being settled in the vocal cords. This topic came up in discussion because of the fast track LMA, in which there is no actual DL, and therefore, I thought NO (or little) sympathetic stimulation. What do you think, and do you know of any research articles related to this topic?

My theory was the Fast Track was a great way to intubate fragile cardiac patients b/c of the lack of DL stimulation. I may be way off.
Just a thought, but shouldn't the adequate frontloading of narcotic before induction in cardiac patients be sufficient to blunt the ANS response to DL?

It should be interesting to see what more experienced providers think in regards to LMA v DL ... I've used the LMA 5 times so far (first clinical residency) and DL around 15 times and haven't noticed an increase in the ANS response with the LMA.

Good topic milo!
Top
 
No. 2
from gaspassah
Old May 29, 2005, 11:06 AM

i usually notice a significant rise in heart tone on the monitor during tracheal stimulation. however after i started using a higher amount of narcotic up to 5 cc's fent (when allowed) and lidocaine 1 mg/kg i dont see it as much. as for a cardiac induction, where i did hearts most patients got 20 ccs of fentanyl to offset the tachycardia from 10 mg pavulon, working in a few ccs of each until it was all given.
d
Top
 
Reply




Thread Tools


Who's Online
111 members
1,345 guests
1,456

0

lawsuit - But don't most RN's work through breaks/lunch...

0

Patient Evaluation of Retail Clinic Care

0

The hard to reach on-call doctor, and its effects on...

4

Woman charged with passing off prescription drug as...

10

Man in "Vegetative State" was conscious for 23...

2

Interesting article on ThedaCare's Collaborative Care Model

12

Possible breakthrough regarding MS

63

16th Philly area hospital to stop delivering babies: Mercy...

10

Really interesting article on Indian open hearts

10

High-Tech Pump Does What Her Heart Can't






Currently Reading This Page: 1 (0 members & 1 guests)

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the Nurse-zine Newsletter.
Enter email address: