CRNA Threat - Page 3Register Today!
- Mar 1, '11 by morphedYou know I wouldn't take it too seriously that a medical student on a medical students forum said nurses weren't the brightest people. I have read many, many, MANY posts on allnurses that say things like "some doctors are so stupid" and "doctors aren't the smartest people in the world". It really is nothing to take to heart. And it's not like they're singling out nurses either...I've heard cardiologists say internists weren't that bright, and other specialist MDs say that you go into Anesthesia if you're lazy.
- Mar 1, '11 by morphedQuote from lckrn2paThanks for your input, I appreciate your inside view on things! Don't take what people say to heart here...it is a nursing forum so I think most people are at least a little biased. I don't agree that nursing school is a joke, but I can see how difficult PA school could be.All I can say is wow, this is really what you think of PA's? You really need to research the role of a PA before you start calling us "little puppy dogs". The clinical rotations for PA's will usually be around 2000/hrs +/-, NP programs hover around 500 +/-and there is continued debate on where it should be for NP's. Then general consensus is minimum of 500hrs. PA students will have minimum 2000hrs HCE prior to entering a program, NP's require 2yrs as a RN which will average to little over 2000hrs. Most PA's applying for school will exceed the 2000hrs, my class average is around 7000 with my HCE at 35,000hrs. PA school is INTENSIVE, I studied more in the 1st 2 weeks of PA school than I did the entire time in Nursing school. To me, nursing school was a joke compared to PA school and I went to a school with a >50% attrition and 99% first pass rate on boards. Out of my class of 62 only 1 did not pass 1st time. Most every NP worked in some capacity during school, VERY few PA's worked and nobody in my class works. I currently spend 36hrs per week physically in class, 3-5 hours per day studying and 10hrs each for Sat/Sun. I will spend 35-45hrs weekly studying. In nursing school, read notes about an hour before class.
Talk to some PA's before you call them puppies, that's pretty insulting and just really shows your ignorance.
- Mar 1, '11 by Skip219Drs like PA and AA because they are in control of them and can bill for their actions. Whereas, the CRNA is taking some of the money out of the MDAs pocket for each case. Do you know who does most anesthesia in the rural settings? Its CRNA where MDAs don't want to work. AA can"t work on their own in away of the opt-out states. In these states the AMA hasn't bought off the politicians with their PAC. There are 40-50,000 CRNAs and about 6000 AA. Its more cost effective for a hospital to employ CRNAs because they can work independently. MDAs stand there supervising inductions and emergences: then bill for it.Last edit by NRSKarenRN on Mar 2, '11
- Mar 1, '11 by PureLifeRNAA is an anesthesia assistant. They attend a 2-3 year school after getting a bachelors in whatever they want (but they have to have the necessary pre-req's). When they graduate they have the same responsibilities/job/pay as CRNA's. They work directly under the anesthesiologist license.Last edit by NRSKarenRN on Mar 2, '11 : Reason: spelling
- Mar 1, '11 by BabyLadyQuote from WolfpackRed....LOL...and you could be correct!!!!!sorry, I will clarify as I think you are confusing anesthesia tech with anesthesia assistants.
The AA involves a graduate level education and works under the supervision of a MDA. I cannot speak to the salary of the AA as I am not aware of it but check the website:
- Mar 1, '11 by Katie5Quote from medic7577Pls remember this post when anyone gripes about MAs.They do have the autonomy - it's called independent practice, and no, the surgeon is not liable for the CRNAs actions...the CRNA is. There are plenty of places in America where CRNAs are practicing independently and autonomously. CRNAs can practice independently in all 50 states. That's part of the beauty of the profession, one can choose what type of practice environment they want to work in - independent, supervised, medically directed, and/or ACT. Obviously there are many variations on the theme, but the choice is there.
I don't think it's unfair that an anesthesiologists makes an average of 2-3 times what a CRNA makes. Society rewards physicians for their long term commitment to education. CRNAs are reimbursed the level that society deems appropriate and based on the complexity and potential dangers of anesthesia. It's a fair wage no doubt. Go shadow an someone performing anesthesia and attempt to appreciate the the complexity and potential dangers and how that gets managed with (most of the time) multiple co-morbidities. Anesthesia looks easy because the nurses and physicians (and AA's) are really good at what they are doing, but there is not much easy about it. To add to that, anesthesia school is no "cake-walk" either...just sayin'.
I also don't think any CRNAs are out looking for any particular "prestige" and I am not sure of these "other benefits" that you mentioned. The primary concern is that nurse anesthetists want to be able to practice to their defined scope of practice without having their practice rights restricted, and there just happens to be some physicians that find that threatening.
One last thing, nurses didn't start anesthesia (can't remember who posted that, or something to that extent). Nurses were selected and trained to provide anesthesia (back in the late 1800's) because there was no money (reimbursement) in it (unless the surgeon was feeling generous) and other physicians did not care about learning a specialty that they could not get paid for. When anesthesia became eligible for reimbursement, physicians again took interest - they invented a "new" term called anesthesiology. And, yes, they did much to advance the science and technology of anesthesia that we enjoy today. Do they have more medical training - yes. Is all of it applicable to delivering anesthesia - lots of debate (on both sides about that one). There is no doubt that anesthesiologists have excellent training, knowledge, and skills which can (and are) invaluable in many circumstances, but don't underestimate the knowlege and expertise of CRNAs either. And, yes, I am aware that everyone has come across a bad CRNA, they are out there - same goes for anesthesiologists (and every other specialty, profession, field, etc.)
Bottom line - CRNAs have a defined scope of practice, and they just want to be allowed to practice within that scope how they choose - everyone else does. When another group attempts to restrict that practice, CRNAs fight back. The defense of nurse anesthesia over the past century has helped pave the way for advanced practice nursing that we see today. We stand on the shoulders of giants...please remember that.
- Mar 1, '11 by wtbcrnaThis all has been said on here time and time again, but I will make a general statement to some of the misconceptions on this thread.
1. CRNAs aren't trying to be physicians. CRNAs have been providing independent anesthesia care for over a hundred years, if anything physicians are trying to take over a nursing speciality. All the research shows that CRNAs are just as safe and effective as anesthesiologists.
2. PAs and AAs are not even in the same category. Physician Assistants were created to provide civilian crossover training for highly trained medics after serving in Vietnam, and to expand medical care. http://www.aapa.org/about-pas/our-history It was around this same time that NPs came into existence, but nurse anesthetist had been around providing the majority of anesthetics since the late 1800's. Nurse anesthetists are the United States oldest nursing speciality.
3. AAs were created for political reasons, and that reason was to give the ASA a political tool to help control CRNA practice with an anesthetic provider who can never increase access to care or compete against anesthesiologists. There are only about 2000 practicing AAs. AAs practice in approximately 16 states under the direct supervision of an anesthesiologist. http://www.anesthesiologistassistant.net/ CRNAs on the other hand practice in every state and every US territory that I know of. CRNAs can and do increase access to care, provide the majority of anesthesia care in the US, are the sole providers in many rural hospitals, and we currently number over 42K. CRNAs and anesthesiologists practicing independently is the most cost efficient type of practice. ACT practices are just behind only all MDA practices as the most expensive. It is often necessary for all MDA practices and many ACT practices to be subsidized by the hospital that employ them because they are too expensive to be economically viable on their own.
4. Physicians are an expensive commodity that the public helps fund. Medicare (the Department of Human and Health Services) provides all or the majority of all residents salaries, and many state/federal monies supplement medical student training costs. The way the physician training is set up physician's size numbers cannot increase in size very easily. CRNAs pay for all or the vast majority of their own training, and provide nearly identical/identical anesthetic care as anesthesiologist residents during their clinical phase which costs the public nothing and saves hospitals millions of dollars a year.
CRNAs are not fighting to gain independence. We are fighting to keep something that we have always had.
- Mar 1, '11 by Cessna172Quote from lckrn2paThe PA's I have met are really very smart. I've likewise met some NPs that have left me in awe too. PA school probably shouldn't be compared to nursing school though, because they aren't supposed to be on the same level. Sounds like PA school is pretty tough from your description.All I can say is wow, this is really what you think of PA's? You really need to research the role of a PA before you start calling us "little puppy dogs". The clinical rotations for PA's will usually be around 2000/hrs +/-, NP programs hover around 500 +/-and there is continued debate on where it should be for NP's. Then general consensus is minimum of 500hrs. PA students will have minimum 2000hrs HCE prior to entering a program, NP's require 2yrs as a RN which will average to little over 2000hrs. Most PA's applying for school will exceed the 2000hrs, my class average is around 7000 with my HCE at 35,000hrs. PA school is INTENSIVE, I studied more in the 1st 2 weeks of PA school than I did the entire time in Nursing school. To me, nursing school was a joke compared to PA school and I went to a school with a >50% attrition and 99% first pass rate on boards. Out of my class of 62 only 1 did not pass 1st time. Most every NP worked in some capacity during school, VERY few PA's worked and nobody in my class works. I currently spend 36hrs per week physically in class, 3-5 hours per day studying and 10hrs each for Sat/Sun. I will spend 35-45hrs weekly studying. In nursing school, read notes about an hour before class.
Talk to some PA's before you call them puppies, that's pretty insulting and just really shows your ignorance.
- Mar 2, '11 by tokidokifantasy[quote=samirish;4810720]I read the following post on a student doctor's forum:
"Agreed. CRNA's and nurses in general aren't the smartest group of people out there.
Well I hope whoever wrote this does not end up in a long term care. Nurses are the ones taking care of aging population in today's society. We have bigger roles than the doctors, so I do not think we should belittle ourselves. Just because we did not go to medical school does not make us less smart, I don't see how that correlates. Nurses are trained in their scope of practice and it's not like we can just go learn something in medical area to make us look "smarter" , i mean really, we went to Nursing school to learn about nursing, so just because the "title" is less prestigious than a MD , it does not make us dumb.
- Mar 2, '11 by tablefor9Quote from lckrn2pa2000 hours per year (40 hrs x 50 wks, you do the math). a 5 yr rn would thus have 10,000+ hrs real world experience. my own are well over 30,000.all i can say is wow, this is really what you think of pa's? you really need to research the role of a pa before you start calling us "little puppy dogs". the clinical rotations for pa's will usually be around 2000/hrs +/-, np programs hover around 500 +/-and there is continued debate on where it should be for np's. then general consensus is minimum of 500hrs. pa students will have minimum 2000hrs hce prior to entering a program, np's require 2yrs as a rn which will average to little over 2000hrs.
Quote from lckrn2pagraduate school is more intensive than undergraduate. that's kinda the point. as for most np students working, in my experience, most of us have to. something about mortgages and kids to feed. with all of one exception, every single pa student i've seen in the last 3 years (doing clinical with us, term after term of them) has counted on mom & dads' $$$ to live on. the exception's husband was a retired military officer, i have to assume that her unemployment was not hurting them. given the choice, i wouldn't work full time, carry a full time class load, and study 30+ hours a week. i certainly won't have much time to sleep over the next couple of years.most pa's applying for school will exceed the 2000hrs, my class average is around 7000 with my hce at 35,000hrs. pa school is intensive, i studied more in the 1st 2 weeks of pa school than i did the entire time in nursing school. to me, nursing school was a joke compared to pa school and i went to a school with a >50% attrition and 99% first pass rate on boards. out of my class of 62 only 1 did not pass 1st time. most every np worked in some capacity during school, very few pa's worked and nobody in my class works. i currently spend 36hrs per week physically in class, 3-5 hours per day studying and 10hrs each for sat/sun. i will spend 35-45hrs weekly studying. in nursing school, read notes about an hour before class.
Quote from lckrn2payou know, you're right. i wish we could do without the jr high neener-neener between np/pas, because neither one has the market cornered on the propensity to be a jerk. i wasn't the one that posted the puppy comment, but i can see the insult in it; don't worry, you repaid the poster in kind.talk to some pa's before you call them puppies, that's pretty insulting and just really shows your ignorance.