Re: Why RPN and not LPn?
The time spent in school varies province to province. I trained in Alberta where we did four academic semesters but went back to back for 13 months instead of two academic years.
It seems as if every programme is being tinkered with. Time spent in hospitals, etc seem to be the reason for some training differences. The programme that I attended has been tinkered with to include first year arts courses at university level, which will make it easier to do the bridge to RN if that is the direction someone wants to go. I think it will change the quality of student in the PN programme, the students will have to have a better command of the written and spoken language and be able to deal with more abstract concepts.
When I went to school, roughly half my class had at least one year post secondary education and a couple had degrees in other fields but we did not receive any credit for our previous education. Hopefully this will change.
And before anyone asks why someone with a degree would do PN instead of RN, it was because there was no accelerated RN programmes at the time, the RN programmes were having 1200plus applications for 120 seats, so people took what they could. I know one LPN who said even with her degree she doesn't have enough science credits to apply for the accelerated RN, so the hurdles are high and still there.
Nursing News